2017Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Secular Living

Jesse M. Smith

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the definitions, experiences, and sociocultural construction of secularity. How do people make meaning out of, and in relation to, the secular? The chapter focuses on those individuals and groups who either reject or are uninterested in religion and who hold no theistic beliefs. This is different task from an academic conversation about historical secularism, the functions of secular states or governments, or the historical processes and expressions of secularization. Ideas of the secular, secularism, and secularity are not easy and straightforward concepts. Their meaning(s) and implications are more varied, flexible, and contested than is often assumed: the secular itself involves many paths and meanings and is expressed and experienced in different ways. It is important to go beyond a simplistic “religious life” versus “secular life” distinction and recognize the variability and versatility of secularity, as that variety is becoming increasingly clear in the contemporary landscape.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the definitions, experiences, and sociocultural construction of secularity. How do people make meaning out of, and in relation to, the secular? The chapter focuses on those individuals and groups who either reject or are uninterested in religion and who hold no theistic beliefs. This is different task from an academic conversation about historical secularism, the functions of secular states or governments, or the historical processes and expressions of secularization. Ideas of the secular, secularism, and secularity are not easy and straightforward concepts. Their meaning(s) and implications are more varied, flexible, and contested than is often assumed: the secular itself involves many paths and meanings and is expressed and experienced in different ways. It is important to go beyond a simplistic “religious life” versus “secular life” distinction and recognize the variability and versatility of secularity, as that variety is becoming increasingly clear in the contemporary landscape.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the definitions, experiences, and sociocultural construction of secularity. How do people make meaning out of, and in relation to, the secular? The chapter focuses on those individuals and groups who either reject or are uninterested in religion and who hold no theistic beliefs. This is different task from an academic conversation about historical secularism, the functions of secular states or governments, or the historical processes and expressions of secularization. Ideas of the secular, secularism, and secularity are not easy and straightforward concepts. Their meaning(s) and implications are more varied, flexible, and contested than is often assumed: the secular itself involves many paths and meanings and is expressed and experienced in different ways. It is important to go beyond a simplistic “religious life” versus “secular life” distinction and recognize the variability and versatility of secularity, as that variety is becoming increasingly clear in the contemporary landscape.

Key concepts: Secularity, Secularism, Secularization, Secular education, Meaning (existential), Secular state, Epistemology, Theism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Secular Living — Research Paper | ScholarLens