1994JAMARequires access

Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism Complicating Deep Venous Thrombosis

John Blebea

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

To the Editor. —The title of the article by Dr Moser and colleagues1more appropriately should have been "Frequent Abnormal Ventilation-Perfusion Scans in Patients With Deep Venous Thrombosis" to accurately reflect the results of the study. Their study was performed between 1987 and 1989 to evaluate the efficacy of tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of thromboembolism. It was subsequently noted that 16 (43%) of 37 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) had ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans with a high probability for pulmonary embolism (PE) although all patients were asymptomatic. Without any confirmatory pulmonary angiograms, the authors' conclusion that at least 43% of patients with bland DVT have asymptomatic PE is unsubstantiated. Assuming that these were not high-risk patients, the accuracy of V/Q scans under such circumstances is undocumented by other studies or by the authors. Although they assert that their scan scoring system is comparable to the high-probability category

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To the Editor. —The title of the article by Dr Moser and colleagues1more appropriately should have been "Frequent Abnormal Ventilation-Perfusion Scans in Patients With Deep Venous Thrombosis" to accurately reflect the results of the study. Their study was performed between 1987 and 1989 to evaluate the efficacy of tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of thromboembolism. It was subsequently noted that 16 (43%) of 37 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) had ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans with a high probability for pulmonary embolism (PE) although all patients were asymptomatic. Without any confirmatory pulmonary angiograms, the authors' conclusion that at least 43% of patients with bland DVT have asymptomatic PE is unsubstantiated. Assuming that these were not high-risk patients, the accuracy of V/Q scans under such circumstances is undocumented by other studies or by the authors. Although they assert that their scan scoring system is comparable to the high-probability category

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To the Editor. —The title of the article by Dr Moser and colleagues1more appropriately should have been "Frequent Abnormal Ventilation-Perfusion Scans in Patients With Deep Venous Thrombosis" to accurately reflect the results of the study. Their study was performed between 1987 and 1989 to evaluate the efficacy of tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of thromboembolism. It was subsequently noted that 16 (43%) of 37 patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) had ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans with a high probability for pulmonary embolism (PE) although all patients were asymptomatic. Without any confirmatory pulmonary angiograms, the authors' conclusion that at least 43% of patients with bland DVT have asymptomatic PE is unsubstantiated. Assuming that these were not high-risk patients, the accuracy of V/Q scans under such circumstances is undocumented by other studies or by the authors. Although they assert that their scan scoring system is comparable to the high-probability category

Key concepts: Medicine, Asymptomatic, Pulmonary embolism, Venous thrombosis, Thrombosis, Radiology, Perfusion, Venous thromboembolism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Asymptomatic Pulmonary Embolism Complicating Deep Venous Thrombosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens