2017Unpublished venueRequires access

RISK MANAGEMENT

Scott McKay

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Risk management response concepts are simple when one understand that they are limited to only four options: internal controls, risk avoidance strategies, risk transfer (risk sharing) strategies and risk acceptance. In selecting risk management responses, a company defaults to risk acceptance when all other risk management strategies are exhausted or no other risk management strategy is employed. ERM guides a company to ensure that risk acceptance aligns with management's risk tolerance, risk appetite, or both. When participants consider control maturity during the risk assessment workshop, the results of the initial risk assessment provide the participants' view of residual risk. However, any risk assessment will not provide comfort over the effectiveness of internal control or other risk management activities apart from some form of independent assurance. Therefore, it makes sense to have some form of residual risk evaluation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Risk management response concepts are simple when one understand that they are limited to only four options: internal controls, risk avoidance strategies, risk transfer (risk sharing) strategies and risk acceptance. In selecting risk management responses, a company defaults to risk acceptance when all other risk management strategies are exhausted or no other risk management strategy is employed. ERM guides a company to ensure that risk acceptance aligns with management's risk tolerance, risk appetite, or both. When participants consider control maturity during the risk assessment workshop, the results of the initial risk assessment provide the participants' view of residual risk. However, any risk assessment will not provide comfort over the effectiveness of internal control or other risk management activities apart from some form of independent assurance. Therefore, it makes sense to have some form of residual risk evaluation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Risk management response concepts are simple when one understand that they are limited to only four options: internal controls, risk avoidance strategies, risk transfer (risk sharing) strategies and risk acceptance. In selecting risk management responses, a company defaults to risk acceptance when all other risk management strategies are exhausted or no other risk management strategy is employed. ERM guides a company to ensure that risk acceptance aligns with management's risk tolerance, risk appetite, or both. When participants consider control maturity during the risk assessment workshop, the results of the initial risk assessment provide the participants' view of residual risk. However, any risk assessment will not provide comfort over the effectiveness of internal control or other risk management activities apart from some form of independent assurance. Therefore, it makes sense to have some form of residual risk evaluation.

Key concepts: Risk management, Risk appetite, IT risk management, Risk analysis (engineering), Enterprise risk management, Residual risk, Risk assessment, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RISK MANAGEMENT — Research Paper | ScholarLens