On Theocracies
David Webster
Abstract
David Webster
Abstract
Although many archaeologists and anthropologists have used the concept of theocracy in discussing the structure and evolution of early complex societies there has been little systematic thought or consensus about its implication. The concept of theocracy is evaluated in the context of present thought on the evolution of complex societes. It is suggested that theocratic organization was well‐suited and even necessary for the emergence of state‐type institutions, and that there is no evolutionary dichotomy between “theocratic” states and, later, more “secular” ones. [theocracy, structure and evolution of complex societies, state formation]
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although many archaeologists and anthropologists have used the concept of theocracy in discussing the structure and evolution of early complex societies there has been little systematic thought or consensus about its implication. The concept of theocracy is evaluated in the context of present thought on the evolution of complex societes. It is suggested that theocratic organization was well‐suited and even necessary for the emergence of state‐type institutions, and that there is no evolutionary dichotomy between “theocratic” states and, later, more “secular” ones. [theocracy, structure and evolution of complex societies, state formation]
Key concepts: Theocracy, Context (archaeology), State (computer science), Sociology, Environmental ethics, Political science, Law, Philosophy