1993Unpublished venueRequires access

A comparision of superscalar and decoupled access/execute architectures

Matthew Farrens, Pius Ng, Phil Nico

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Even with a very accurate dynamic branch predictor, a superscalar processor must predict instruction fetch addresses no later than the first pipeline stage to avoid suffering pipeline bubbles every time a branch is taken. Unfortunately, branch addresses generally are not known prior to instruction decode. Therefore, some indirect technique is required to identify a branch instruction and enable branch prediction while the branch instruction is being fetched. This is the branch identification problem. Intel Pentium adopts a scheme that solves this problem; however, its scheme assumes an issue rate of two instructions per cycle. An aggressive superscalar processor, issuing more than two instructions per cycle, cannot effectively use that scheme. The authors propose and compare two viable schemes for solving the branch identification problem for wide-issue superscalar processors.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Even with a very accurate dynamic branch predictor, a superscalar processor must predict instruction fetch addresses no later than the first pipeline stage to avoid suffering pipeline bubbles every time a branch is taken. Unfortunately, branch addresses generally are not known prior to instruction decode. Therefore, some indirect technique is required to identify a branch instruction and enable branch prediction while the branch instruction is being fetched. This is the branch identification problem. Intel Pentium adopts a scheme that solves this problem; however, its scheme assumes an issue rate of two instructions per cycle. An aggressive superscalar processor, issuing more than two instructions per cycle, cannot effectively use that scheme. The authors propose and compare two viable schemes for solving the branch identification problem for wide-issue superscalar processors.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Even with a very accurate dynamic branch predictor, a superscalar processor must predict instruction fetch addresses no later than the first pipeline stage to avoid suffering pipeline bubbles every time a branch is taken. Unfortunately, branch addresses generally are not known prior to instruction decode. Therefore, some indirect technique is required to identify a branch instruction and enable branch prediction while the branch instruction is being fetched. This is the branch identification problem. Intel Pentium adopts a scheme that solves this problem; however, its scheme assumes an issue rate of two instructions per cycle. An aggressive superscalar processor, issuing more than two instructions per cycle, cannot effectively use that scheme. The authors propose and compare two viable schemes for solving the branch identification problem for wide-issue superscalar processors.>

Key concepts: Superscalar, Pentium, Computer science, Branch predictor, Pipeline (software), Parallel computing, Instructions per cycle, Scheme (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparision of superscalar and decoupled access/execute architectures — Research Paper | ScholarLens