2000Biochemical JournalOpen access

Four isoforms of serum response factor that increase or inhibit smooth-muscle-specific promoter activity

Paul R. Kemp, James C. Metcalfe

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

Serum response factor (SRF) is a key transcriptional activator of the c-fos gene and of muscle-specific gene expression. We have identified four forms of the SRF coding sequence, SRF-L (the previously identified form), SRF-M, SRF-S and SRF-I, that are produced by alternative splicing. The new forms of SRF lack regions of the C-terminal transactivation domain by splicing out of exon 5 (SRF-M), exons 4 and 5 (SRF-S) and exons 3, 4 and 5 (SRF-I). SRF-M is expressed at similar levels to SRF-L in differentiated vascular smooth-muscle cells and skeletal-muscle cells, whereas SRF-L is the predominant form in many other tissues. SRF-S expression is restricted to vascular smooth muscle and SRF-I expression is restricted to the embryo. Transfection of SRF-L and SRF-M into C2C12 cells showed that both forms are transactivators of the promoter of the smooth-muscle-specific gene SM22α, whereas SRF-I acted as a dominant negative form of SRF.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Serum response factor (SRF) is a key transcriptional activator of the c-fos gene and of muscle-specific gene expression. We have identified four forms of the SRF coding sequence, SRF-L (the previously identified form), SRF-M, SRF-S and SRF-I, that are produced by alternative splicing. The new forms of SRF lack regions of the C-terminal transactivation domain by splicing out of exon 5 (SRF-M), exons 4 and 5 (SRF-S) and exons 3, 4 and 5 (SRF-I). SRF-M is expressed at similar levels to SRF-L in differentiated vascular smooth-muscle cells and skeletal-muscle cells, whereas SRF-L is the predominant form in many other tissues. SRF-S expression is restricted to vascular smooth muscle and SRF-I expression is restricted to the embryo. Transfection of SRF-L and SRF-M into C2C12 cells showed that both forms are transactivators of the promoter of the smooth-muscle-specific gene SM22α, whereas SRF-I acted as a dominant negative form of SRF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Serum response factor (SRF) is a key transcriptional activator of the c-fos gene and of muscle-specific gene expression. We have identified four forms of the SRF coding sequence, SRF-L (the previously identified form), SRF-M, SRF-S and SRF-I, that are produced by alternative splicing. The new forms of SRF lack regions of the C-terminal transactivation domain by splicing out of exon 5 (SRF-M), exons 4 and 5 (SRF-S) and exons 3, 4 and 5 (SRF-I). SRF-M is expressed at similar levels to SRF-L in differentiated vascular smooth-muscle cells and skeletal-muscle cells, whereas SRF-L is the predominant form in many other tissues. SRF-S expression is restricted to vascular smooth muscle and SRF-I expression is restricted to the embryo. Transfection of SRF-L and SRF-M into C2C12 cells showed that both forms are transactivators of the promoter of the smooth-muscle-specific gene SM22α, whereas SRF-I acted as a dominant negative form of SRF.

Key concepts: Serum response factor, Serum Response Element, Molecular biology, Biology, Exon, Alternative splicing, Transactivation, C2C12

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Four isoforms of serum response factor that increase or inhibit smooth-muscle-specific promoter activity — Research Paper | ScholarLens