2000Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Pleasure and Desire

Henry Sidgwick

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This piece, which was revised greatly subsequent to the publication of the Methods of Ethics, appears in this collection in its original form. In it, Sidgwick distinguishes between Universal Hedonism (utilitarianism) and Egoistic Hedonism, the former espoused by Bentham, who nonetheless approves of individual self‐interest (in the form of public spiritedness), which he regards as inevitable. Mill attempts to forge a connection between the psychological and ethical principles that he and Bentham share, maintaining that, since each person seeks her own happiness, she ought to seek the happiness of others. Sidgwick endeavours to dissociate universal hedonism from the egoistic notions that appear in both Bentham and Mill's positions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This piece, which was revised greatly subsequent to the publication of the Methods of Ethics, appears in this collection in its original form. In it, Sidgwick distinguishes between Universal Hedonism (utilitarianism) and Egoistic Hedonism, the former espoused by Bentham, who nonetheless approves of individual self‐interest (in the form of public spiritedness), which he regards as inevitable. Mill attempts to forge a connection between the psychological and ethical principles that he and Bentham share, maintaining that, since each person seeks her own happiness, she ought to seek the happiness of others. Sidgwick endeavours to dissociate universal hedonism from the egoistic notions that appear in both Bentham and Mill's positions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This piece, which was revised greatly subsequent to the publication of the Methods of Ethics, appears in this collection in its original form. In it, Sidgwick distinguishes between Universal Hedonism (utilitarianism) and Egoistic Hedonism, the former espoused by Bentham, who nonetheless approves of individual self‐interest (in the form of public spiritedness), which he regards as inevitable. Mill attempts to forge a connection between the psychological and ethical principles that he and Bentham share, maintaining that, since each person seeks her own happiness, she ought to seek the happiness of others. Sidgwick endeavours to dissociate universal hedonism from the egoistic notions that appear in both Bentham and Mill's positions.

Key concepts: Hedonism, Happiness, Utilitarianism, Pleasure, Jeremy bentham, Mill, Psychology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pleasure and Desire — Research Paper | ScholarLens