Social media legitimacy
James Patrick Toscano
Abstract
James Patrick Toscano
Abstract
Public engagement via social media is not treated as legitimate citizen participation. Too often, participation via social media fails to lead to informed decision-making, better public policies, or stronger service delivery. In this thesis, I detail barriers to social media legitimacy in participation, including current laws and organization behaviors. Using Arnstein's ladder of participation as a theoretical foundation, I propose a new evaluative framework for public participation [nil] a Social Media Participation Range. The framework offers a new evaluative tool for researchers and practitioners to analyze citizen participation via social media.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Public engagement via social media is not treated as legitimate citizen participation. Too often, participation via social media fails to lead to informed decision-making, better public policies, or stronger service delivery. In this thesis, I detail barriers to social media legitimacy in participation, including current laws and organization behaviors. Using Arnstein's ladder of participation as a theoretical foundation, I propose a new evaluative framework for public participation [nil] a Social Media Participation Range. The framework offers a new evaluative tool for researchers and practitioners to analyze citizen participation via social media.
Key concepts: Legitimacy, Social media, Public relations, Public participation, Public engagement, Political science, Foundation (evidence), Social engagement