1997Anesthesia & AnalgesiaRequires access

Types of Colloid Therapy in Critically Ill Patients

Joachim Boldt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We appreciate Dr. Gallagher's comments on our article, which deals with different types of colloid therapy in critically ill patients. However, we disagree with Dr. Gallagher that the only reason for the differences between the groups results from the fact that filling volumes were larger in those patients treated with hydroxyethyl starch. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure (not shown in the article) were similar within both subgroups (trauma/sepsis). Right ventricular endiastolic volume index and right ventricular endsystolic volume index were also without difference in both trauma groups. Nevertheless, cardiac index, oxygen consumption index, and oxygen delivery index were significantly more increased in the hydroxyethylstarch solution (HES)-than in the human albumin-treated group. Only right ventricular endiastolic volume index was different between HES- and human albumin-treated sepsis patients. This was statistically different, but it is doubtful whether this difference was relevant (maximum difference between the two HES-treated sepsis groups = 14 ml/kg [approximately 8%-10% difference]). Thus, it seems likely to us that the beneficial effects of intravascular volume replacement with HES, which were commented on by an editorial in the same issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, were due to different amounts of infusion volume. Joachim Boldt, MD Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine; Justus-Liebig-University Giessen; 35392 Giessen, Germany

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We appreciate Dr. Gallagher's comments on our article, which deals with different types of colloid therapy in critically ill patients. However, we disagree with Dr. Gallagher that the only reason for the differences between the groups results from the fact that filling volumes were larger in those patients treated with hydroxyethyl starch. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure (not shown in the article) were similar within both subgroups (trauma/sepsis). Right ventricular endiastolic volume index and right ventricular endsystolic volume index were also without difference in both trauma groups. Nevertheless, cardiac index, oxygen consumption index, and oxygen delivery index were significantly more increased in the hydroxyethylstarch solution (HES)-than in the human albumin-treated group. Only right ventricular endiastolic volume index was different between HES- and human albumin-treated sepsis patients. This was statistically different, but it is doubtful whether this difference was relevant (maximum difference between the two HES-treated sepsis groups = 14 ml/kg [approximately 8%-10% difference]). Thus, it seems likely to us that the beneficial effects of intravascular volume replacement with HES, which were commented on by an editorial in the same issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, were due to different amounts of infusion volume. Joachim Boldt, MD Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine; Justus-Liebig-University Giessen; 35392 Giessen, Germany

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We appreciate Dr. Gallagher's comments on our article, which deals with different types of colloid therapy in critically ill patients. However, we disagree with Dr. Gallagher that the only reason for the differences between the groups results from the fact that filling volumes were larger in those patients treated with hydroxyethyl starch. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and central venous pressure (not shown in the article) were similar within both subgroups (trauma/sepsis). Right ventricular endiastolic volume index and right ventricular endsystolic volume index were also without difference in both trauma groups. Nevertheless, cardiac index, oxygen consumption index, and oxygen delivery index were significantly more increased in the hydroxyethylstarch solution (HES)-than in the human albumin-treated group. Only right ventricular endiastolic volume index was different between HES- and human albumin-treated sepsis patients. This was statistically different, but it is doubtful whether this difference was relevant (maximum difference between the two HES-treated sepsis groups = 14 ml/kg [approximately 8%-10% difference]). Thus, it seems likely to us that the beneficial effects of intravascular volume replacement with HES, which were commented on by an editorial in the same issue of Anesthesia & Analgesia, were due to different amounts of infusion volume. Joachim Boldt, MD Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine; Justus-Liebig-University Giessen; 35392 Giessen, Germany

Key concepts: Hydroxyethyl starch, Medicine, Pulmonary wedge pressure, Sepsis, Critically ill, Anesthesiology, Cardiac index, Intravascular volume status

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Types of Colloid Therapy in Critically Ill Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens