2022Unpublished venueOpen access

Surgical treatment of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: comparative results of selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus anterior temporal lobectomy from a referral center in Brazil

Laryssa Crystinne Azevedo Almeida, Vanessa Alves Lobato, Maria do Carmo Vasconcelos Santos, Aline Curcio de Moraes, Bruno Silva Costa

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) is a high prevalence neurological disorder and tends to drug refractoriness. Surgery has emerged as a promising treatment for managing crises and a better quality of life for these patients. The objective of this work is to compare the surgical results in terms of seizure control concerning the surgical technique performed (Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) vs. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH)) in a cohort of 132 patients operated in an epilepsy reference center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study based on the review of medical records of 146 patients operated for TLE from 2008 to 2019 at the Santa Casa de Misericordia in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Initially, 13 patients were excluded from the study due to insufficient medical record data or follow-up loss. One patient was excluded from the analysis of the results due to death in the first postoperative week. We used the ILAE scale to classify seizure control after surgery. In patients with left hippocampal sclerosis, the most selective approach was performed (SAH), and in right temporal lobe epilepsy, ATL was the approach of choice. We compared the surgical groups using the survival and Kaplan-Maier curves. RESULTS A total of 132 patients were evaluated in this study, with a mean follow-up time after surgery of 57.2 months (12-137). In our data analysis, we found that the group of patients undergoing ATL had a higher prevalence of being completely seizure-free (ILAE I) (57.1% vs. 31%) and a higher rate of satisfactory seizure control (88.6% vs. 69.3%) p =0,006, when compared to patients undergoing SAH. CONCLUSION The literature is still controversial about seizure control results concerning the surgical technique used due to the lack of studies with a robust methodology for an adequate comparison. In our data analysis, we identified the superiority of ATL over SAH in seizure outcomes. In countries with a cost limitation for extended propaedeutics, ATL may be the best option for the proper control of seizures with minimal additional morbidity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) is a high prevalence neurological disorder and tends to drug refractoriness. Surgery has emerged as a promising treatment for managing crises and a better quality of life for these patients. The objective of this work is to compare the surgical results in terms of seizure control concerning the surgical technique performed (Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) vs. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH)) in a cohort of 132 patients operated in an epilepsy reference center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study based on the review of medical records of 146 patients operated for TLE from 2008 to 2019 at the Santa Casa de Misericordia in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Initially, 13 patients were excluded from the study due to insufficient medical record data or follow-up loss. One patient was excluded from the analysis of the results due to death in the first postoperative week. We used the ILAE scale to classify seizure control after surgery. In patients with left hippocampal sclerosis, the most selective approach was performed (SAH), and in right temporal lobe epilepsy, ATL was the approach of choice. We compared the surgical groups using the survival and Kaplan-Maier curves. RESULTS A total of 132 patients were evaluated in this study, with a mean follow-up time after surgery of 57.2 months (12-137). In our data analysis, we found that the group of patients undergoing ATL had a higher prevalence of being completely seizure-free (ILAE I) (57.1% vs. 31%) and a higher rate of satisfactory seizure control (88.6% vs. 69.3%) p =0,006, when compared to patients undergoing SAH. CONCLUSION The literature is still controversial about seizure control results concerning the surgical technique used due to the lack of studies with a robust methodology for an adequate comparison. In our data analysis, we identified the superiority of ATL over SAH in seizure outcomes. In countries with a cost limitation for extended propaedeutics, ATL may be the best option for the proper control of seizures with minimal additional morbidity.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) is a high prevalence neurological disorder and tends to drug refractoriness. Surgery has emerged as a promising treatment for managing crises and a better quality of life for these patients. The objective of this work is to compare the surgical results in terms of seizure control concerning the surgical technique performed (Anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) vs. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH)) in a cohort of 132 patients operated in an epilepsy reference center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective study based on the review of medical records of 146 patients operated for TLE from 2008 to 2019 at the Santa Casa de Misericordia in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Initially, 13 patients were excluded from the study due to insufficient medical record data or follow-up loss. One patient was excluded from the analysis of the results due to death in the first postoperative week. We used the ILAE scale to classify seizure control after surgery. In patients with left hippocampal sclerosis, the most selective approach was performed (SAH), and in right temporal lobe epilepsy, ATL was the approach of choice. We compared the surgical groups using the survival and Kaplan-Maier curves. RESULTS A total of 132 patients were evaluated in this study, with a mean follow-up time after surgery of 57.2 months (12-137). In our data analysis, we found that the group of patients undergoing ATL had a higher prevalence of being completely seizure-free (ILAE I) (57.1% vs. 31%) and a higher rate of satisfactory seizure control (88.6% vs. 69.3%) p =0,006, when compared to patients undergoing SAH. CONCLUSION The literature is still controversial about seizure control results concerning the surgical technique used due to the lack of studies with a robust methodology for an adequate comparison. In our data analysis, we identified the superiority of ATL over SAH in seizure outcomes. In countries with a cost limitation for extended propaedeutics, ATL may be the best option for the proper control of seizures with minimal additional morbidity.

Key concepts: Anterior temporal lobectomy, Hippocampal sclerosis, Temporal lobe, Epilepsy, Medicine, Epilepsy surgery, Medical record, Retrospective cohort study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Surgical treatment of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: comparative results of selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus anterior temporal lobectomy from a referral center in Brazil — Research Paper | ScholarLens