2022EndoscopyRequires access

EARLY CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY AND DEVICE-ASSISTED ENTEROSCOPY IN OVERT BLEEDING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS

M.M. Estevinho, Rachel Camargo de Pinho, Cristina Gevehr Fernandes, Ângela Rodrigues, Alice Ponte, Adolfo Cassoli Gomes, E. Afecto, Jaqueliny Felix Correia, Tatiana Caroline S. B. Freitas

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Aims The best timing for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) for the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to compare, for the first time, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, detection of active bleeding and vascular lesions, rebleeding, and mortality of “early” versus “non-early” SBCE and DAE. Methods Three online databases were searched to identify studies comparing “early” versus “non-early” SBCE and DAE. Random effects meta-analysis was performed; reporting quality was also assessed. Results From 1974 records, 39 were included (4825 patients). Time intervals for the “early” approach varied, until 14 days in SBCE and 72h in DAE. The pooled diagnostic and therapeutic yields of “early” DAE were superior to those of SBCE (7.97% and 20.89%, respectively, p<0.05). The odds for active bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 5.09, I2=53%), positive diagnosis (OR 3.99, I2=45%), and therapeutic intervention (OR 3.86, I2=67%) were higher in the “early” group for SBCE and DAE (p<0.01). Regarding diagnostic yield, subgroup effects existed for the number of patients in the “early” approach. Our study failed to identify differences when studies were classified according to time intervals for early DAE (I2<5%), yet the analysis was limited due to a lack of data availability. Lower rebleeding in “early” SBCE and DAE was observed (OR 0.40, p<0.01, I2=0%). Conclusions The role of small bowel studies in the early evaluation of OGIB is unquestionable, impacting diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis. Comparative studies are still needed to identify the best timings. Publication History Article published online: 14 April 2022 © 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aims The best timing for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) for the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to compare, for the first time, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, detection of active bleeding and vascular lesions, rebleeding, and mortality of “early” versus “non-early” SBCE and DAE. Methods Three online databases were searched to identify studies comparing “early” versus “non-early” SBCE and DAE. Random effects meta-analysis was performed; reporting quality was also assessed. Results From 1974 records, 39 were included (4825 patients). Time intervals for the “early” approach varied, until 14 days in SBCE and 72h in DAE. The pooled diagnostic and therapeutic yields of “early” DAE were superior to those of SBCE (7.97% and 20.89%, respectively, p<0.05). The odds for active bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 5.09, I2=53%), positive diagnosis (OR 3.99, I2=45%), and therapeutic intervention (OR 3.86, I2=67%) were higher in the “early” group for SBCE and DAE (p<0.01). Regarding diagnostic yield, subgroup effects existed for the number of patients in the “early” approach. Our study failed to identify differences when studies were classified according to time intervals for early DAE (I2<5%), yet the analysis was limited due to a lack of data availability. Lower rebleeding in “early” SBCE and DAE was observed (OR 0.40, p<0.01, I2=0%). Conclusions The role of small bowel studies in the early evaluation of OGIB is unquestionable, impacting diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis. Comparative studies are still needed to identify the best timings. Publication History Article published online: 14 April 2022 © 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aims The best timing for small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) for the management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) remains unknown. This meta-analysis aimed to compare, for the first time, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, detection of active bleeding and vascular lesions, rebleeding, and mortality of “early” versus “non-early” SBCE and DAE. Methods Three online databases were searched to identify studies comparing “early” versus “non-early” SBCE and DAE. Random effects meta-analysis was performed; reporting quality was also assessed. Results From 1974 records, 39 were included (4825 patients). Time intervals for the “early” approach varied, until 14 days in SBCE and 72h in DAE. The pooled diagnostic and therapeutic yields of “early” DAE were superior to those of SBCE (7.97% and 20.89%, respectively, p<0.05). The odds for active bleeding (odds ratio [OR] 5.09, I2=53%), positive diagnosis (OR 3.99, I2=45%), and therapeutic intervention (OR 3.86, I2=67%) were higher in the “early” group for SBCE and DAE (p<0.01). Regarding diagnostic yield, subgroup effects existed for the number of patients in the “early” approach. Our study failed to identify differences when studies were classified according to time intervals for early DAE (I2<5%), yet the analysis was limited due to a lack of data availability. Lower rebleeding in “early” SBCE and DAE was observed (OR 0.40, p<0.01, I2=0%). Conclusions The role of small bowel studies in the early evaluation of OGIB is unquestionable, impacting diagnosis, therapeutic, and prognosis. Comparative studies are still needed to identify the best timings. Publication History Article published online: 14 April 2022 © 2022. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Key concepts: Medicine, Capsule endoscopy, Enteroscopy, Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Meta-analysis, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal bleeding, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EARLY CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY AND DEVICE-ASSISTED ENTEROSCOPY IN OVERT BLEEDING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS — Research Paper | ScholarLens