Different human placental epigenetics changes in pregnancies affected with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction
Carter Norton, Joshua Aaron Holmstrom, Paul R. Reynolds, Timothy G. Jenkins, Juan Alberto Arroyo
Abstract
Carter Norton, Joshua Aaron Holmstrom, Paul R. Reynolds, Timothy G. Jenkins, Juan Alberto Arroyo
Abstract
The placenta facilitates nutrient and gas exchange between the mother and the fetus. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE) are placental pathologies known to cause pre‐term delivery and diverse disorders in neonates. Placental adversities during complicated pregnancy may cause epigenetic changes that can altered fetal development. DNA methylation is a heritable epigenetic process that can regulate important genetic mechanisms and processes critical for optimal placental and fetal development. Our objective was to determine differential placental DNA methylation from normal, PE and IUGR human patients. Placental DNA was extracted from PE, IUGR, and control patients. Extracted DNA was then bisulfite converted for DNA methylation analysis. Bisulfite‐converted DNA was hybridized to Illumina’s EPIC 850K methylation array for analysis. Methylation data was SWAN normalized and significant regions were identified using USEQ’s “methylation array scanner” and “enriched region maker” applications (with a threshold of significance of an adjusted p‐value < 0.001). UCSC’s Genome browser was used to identify potentially impacted gene promoters associated with differentially methylated regions. Additionally, Stanford’s GREAT analysis tool was used to perform a GO term analysis to find biological processes and cellular components associated with differentially methylated regions. We observed nine significantly hypomethylated regions, six for PE (including the HIST1H4L and NAPRT‐1) and three for IUGR (including CRABP1). Two regions significantly hypomethylated for both PE and IGUR gene promoters. We conclude that although we identified a unique methylation profile for both PE and IUGR, the overlap that was seen with some methylation alterations between the two pathologies could explain some of the clinical similarities observed during these obstetrics complications. Our results may provide some insights into placenta cell regulatory response to developmental syndromes. Information in these cellular components and biological pathways could be useful in determining cellular level responses to complicated diseases associated with PE and IUGR.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The placenta facilitates nutrient and gas exchange between the mother and the fetus. Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preeclampsia (PE) are placental pathologies known to cause pre‐term delivery and diverse disorders in neonates. Placental adversities during complicated pregnancy may cause epigenetic changes that can altered fetal development. DNA methylation is a heritable epigenetic process that can regulate important genetic mechanisms and processes critical for optimal placental and fetal development. Our objective was to determine differential placental DNA methylation from normal, PE and IUGR human patients. Placental DNA was extracted from PE, IUGR, and control patients. Extracted DNA was then bisulfite converted for DNA methylation analysis. Bisulfite‐converted DNA was hybridized to Illumina’s EPIC 850K methylation array for analysis. Methylation data was SWAN normalized and significant regions were identified using USEQ’s “methylation array scanner” and “enriched region maker” applications (with a threshold of significance of an adjusted p‐value < 0.001). UCSC’s Genome browser was used to identify potentially impacted gene promoters associated with differentially methylated regions. Additionally, Stanford’s GREAT analysis tool was used to perform a GO term analysis to find biological processes and cellular components associated with differentially methylated regions. We observed nine significantly hypomethylated regions, six for PE (including the HIST1H4L and NAPRT‐1) and three for IUGR (including CRABP1). Two regions significantly hypomethylated for both PE and IGUR gene promoters. We conclude that although we identified a unique methylation profile for both PE and IUGR, the overlap that was seen with some methylation alterations between the two pathologies could explain some of the clinical similarities observed during these obstetrics complications. Our results may provide some insights into placenta cell regulatory response to developmental syndromes. Information in these cellular components and biological pathways could be useful in determining cellular level responses to complicated diseases associated with PE and IUGR.
Key concepts: Epigenetics, DNA methylation, Differentially methylated regions, Intrauterine growth restriction, Methylation, Biology, Placenta, Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation