2022Geophysical Research LettersRequires access

The Challenge of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Prediction by ECMWF on Subseasonal Time Scales

Yongwu Xiu, Hao Luo, Qinghua Yang, Steffen Tietsche, Jonathan J. Day, Dake Chen

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Abstract A recent study has provided the first thorough assessment of subseasonal Arctic sea ice edge prediction in operational forecast systems. However, the corresponding assessment of the Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) is still lacking. Here, the Arctic SIT reforecasts from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) on subseasonal time scales are evaluated for the first time using a well‐developed SIT reanalysis data set. The results show that ECMWF forecasts of Arctic SIT are more skillful than persistence forecast (PFs) during the transition seasons for lead times longer than 30 days, indicating the advantages of dynamical prediction. However, ECMWF suffers from large initial SIT errors and has lower skill than a PF, especially from March to June. Thus, subseasonal Arctic SIT predictions still face many challenges, and improving the mean SIT in the model and assimilating satellite‐estimated SIT in the ocean analysis would significantly improve SIT forecasts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A recent study has provided the first thorough assessment of subseasonal Arctic sea ice edge prediction in operational forecast systems. However, the corresponding assessment of the Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) is still lacking. Here, the Arctic SIT reforecasts from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) on subseasonal time scales are evaluated for the first time using a well‐developed SIT reanalysis data set. The results show that ECMWF forecasts of Arctic SIT are more skillful than persistence forecast (PFs) during the transition seasons for lead times longer than 30 days, indicating the advantages of dynamical prediction. However, ECMWF suffers from large initial SIT errors and has lower skill than a PF, especially from March to June. Thus, subseasonal Arctic SIT predictions still face many challenges, and improving the mean SIT in the model and assimilating satellite‐estimated SIT in the ocean analysis would significantly improve SIT forecasts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A recent study has provided the first thorough assessment of subseasonal Arctic sea ice edge prediction in operational forecast systems. However, the corresponding assessment of the Arctic sea ice thickness (SIT) is still lacking. Here, the Arctic SIT reforecasts from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) on subseasonal time scales are evaluated for the first time using a well‐developed SIT reanalysis data set. The results show that ECMWF forecasts of Arctic SIT are more skillful than persistence forecast (PFs) during the transition seasons for lead times longer than 30 days, indicating the advantages of dynamical prediction. However, ECMWF suffers from large initial SIT errors and has lower skill than a PF, especially from March to June. Thus, subseasonal Arctic SIT predictions still face many challenges, and improving the mean SIT in the model and assimilating satellite‐estimated SIT in the ocean analysis would significantly improve SIT forecasts.

Key concepts: Climatology, Arctic, Environmental science, Sea ice, Arctic ice pack, The arctic, Forecast skill, Meteorology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Challenge of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness Prediction by ECMWF on Subseasonal Time Scales — Research Paper | ScholarLens