Issues of Legislation and Practice of Criminal Liability for Hooliganism
Elena N. Fedik, Alexey D. Shcherbakov
Abstract
Elena N. Fedik, Alexey D. Shcherbakov
Abstract
The legislator has repeatedly changed his attitude to the content of the composition, provided for by Article 213 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, hooliganism. The authors examines how the characteristics of hooliganism have changed in comparison with the Criminal Code of the RSFSR, what innovations the legislator introduced into the main corpus delicti in terms of the use of violence, and how this affected law enforcement practice. Also touched upon certain aspects of limiting hooliganism from related offenses.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The legislator has repeatedly changed his attitude to the content of the composition, provided for by Article 213 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, hooliganism. The authors examines how the characteristics of hooliganism have changed in comparison with the Criminal Code of the RSFSR, what innovations the legislator introduced into the main corpus delicti in terms of the use of violence, and how this affected law enforcement practice. Also touched upon certain aspects of limiting hooliganism from related offenses.
Key concepts: Legislator, Criminal code, Legislation, Political science, Criminal liability, Criminal law, Law, Criminology