2022Unpublished venueRequires access

The Argument

Brian Leftow

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter presents Anselm’s modal argument for God’s existence. It shows that the argument is valid. It also evaluates some of its premises for truth. One premise asserts that a perfect being would exist necessarily. The rest of the book examines this. Another denies that a possible being has contradictory properties. Another turns out to be true given the Brouwer system of modal logic. One premise commits Anselm to a controversial thesis that is at the core of Meinong’s views, that an item can have attributes whether or not it exists. The chapter suggests that Anselm would do well to drop this premise, and suggests a substitute.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter presents Anselm’s modal argument for God’s existence. It shows that the argument is valid. It also evaluates some of its premises for truth. One premise asserts that a perfect being would exist necessarily. The rest of the book examines this. Another denies that a possible being has contradictory properties. Another turns out to be true given the Brouwer system of modal logic. One premise commits Anselm to a controversial thesis that is at the core of Meinong’s views, that an item can have attributes whether or not it exists. The chapter suggests that Anselm would do well to drop this premise, and suggests a substitute.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter presents Anselm’s modal argument for God’s existence. It shows that the argument is valid. It also evaluates some of its premises for truth. One premise asserts that a perfect being would exist necessarily. The rest of the book examines this. Another denies that a possible being has contradictory properties. Another turns out to be true given the Brouwer system of modal logic. One premise commits Anselm to a controversial thesis that is at the core of Meinong’s views, that an item can have attributes whether or not it exists. The chapter suggests that Anselm would do well to drop this premise, and suggests a substitute.

Key concepts: Premise, Argument (complex analysis), Ontological argument, Epistemology, Philosophy, Modal, Core (optical fiber), Modal logic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Argument — Research Paper | ScholarLens