2022Journal of the American Society for Mass SpectrometryOpen access

Effect of Traveling Waveform Profiles on Collision Cross Section Measurements in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations

Pearl Kwantwi-Barima, Christopher Harrilal, Sandilya Garimella, Isaac Attah, Richard Smith, Yehia Ibrahim

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

We evaluated the effect of four different waveform profiles (Square, Sine, Triangle, and asymmetric Sawtooth) on the accuracy of collision cross section (CCS) measurements using traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) separations in structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM). The effects of the waveform profiles on the accuracy of the CCS measurements were evaluated for four classes of compounds (lipids, peptides, steroids, and nucleosides) at different TW speeds (126–206 m/s) and amplitudes (15–89 V). For the lipids and peptides, the TWIMS-based CCS ( TW CCS) deviations from the corresponding drift-tube-based CCS ( DT CCS) measurements were significantly lower in experiments conducted using the Sawtooth waveform compared to the square waveform. This observation can be rationalized by the lower maximum electric field experienced by ions with a Sawtooth waveform, as compared to the other waveforms, resulting in a lower probability for significant ion heating. We also observed that given approximately comparable resolution for all four waveforms, the Sawtooth waveform resulted in lower TW CCS error and a better agreement with DT CCS values than the Square waveform. In addition, for the steroids and nucleosides, an opposite TW CCS trend was observed, with higher errors with the Sawtooth waveform and lower with the Square waveform, suggesting that these molecules tend to become slightly more compact under ion heating conditions. Under optimum conditions, all TW CCS measurements on the SLIM platform were within 0.5% of those measured in the drift tube ion mobility spectrometry.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We evaluated the effect of four different waveform profiles (Square, Sine, Triangle, and asymmetric Sawtooth) on the accuracy of collision cross section (CCS) measurements using traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) separations in structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM). The effects of the waveform profiles on the accuracy of the CCS measurements were evaluated for four classes of compounds (lipids, peptides, steroids, and nucleosides) at different TW speeds (126–206 m/s) and amplitudes (15–89 V). For the lipids and peptides, the TWIMS-based CCS ( TW CCS) deviations from the corresponding drift-tube-based CCS ( DT CCS) measurements were significantly lower in experiments conducted using the Sawtooth waveform compared to the square waveform. This observation can be rationalized by the lower maximum electric field experienced by ions with a Sawtooth waveform, as compared to the other waveforms, resulting in a lower probability for significant ion heating. We also observed that given approximately comparable resolution for all four waveforms, the Sawtooth waveform resulted in lower TW CCS error and a better agreement with DT CCS values than the Square waveform. In addition, for the steroids and nucleosides, an opposite TW CCS trend was observed, with higher errors with the Sawtooth waveform and lower with the Square waveform, suggesting that these molecules tend to become slightly more compact under ion heating conditions. Under optimum conditions, all TW CCS measurements on the SLIM platform were within 0.5% of those measured in the drift tube ion mobility spectrometry.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We evaluated the effect of four different waveform profiles (Square, Sine, Triangle, and asymmetric Sawtooth) on the accuracy of collision cross section (CCS) measurements using traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) separations in structures for lossless ion manipulations (SLIM). The effects of the waveform profiles on the accuracy of the CCS measurements were evaluated for four classes of compounds (lipids, peptides, steroids, and nucleosides) at different TW speeds (126–206 m/s) and amplitudes (15–89 V). For the lipids and peptides, the TWIMS-based CCS ( TW CCS) deviations from the corresponding drift-tube-based CCS ( DT CCS) measurements were significantly lower in experiments conducted using the Sawtooth waveform compared to the square waveform. This observation can be rationalized by the lower maximum electric field experienced by ions with a Sawtooth waveform, as compared to the other waveforms, resulting in a lower probability for significant ion heating. We also observed that given approximately comparable resolution for all four waveforms, the Sawtooth waveform resulted in lower TW CCS error and a better agreement with DT CCS values than the Square waveform. In addition, for the steroids and nucleosides, an opposite TW CCS trend was observed, with higher errors with the Sawtooth waveform and lower with the Square waveform, suggesting that these molecules tend to become slightly more compact under ion heating conditions. Under optimum conditions, all TW CCS measurements on the SLIM platform were within 0.5% of those measured in the drift tube ion mobility spectrometry.

Key concepts: Sawtooth wave, Waveform, Chemistry, Ion, Ion-mobility spectrometry, Square wave, Amplitude, Atomic physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Traveling Waveform Profiles on Collision Cross Section Measurements in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations — Research Paper | ScholarLens