2022Unpublished venueOpen access

Students' Justification Strategies on the Correctness and Equivalence of Computer-Based Algebraic Expressions

Eirini Geraniou, Manolis Mavrikis

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter describes how 11- to 14-year-old students in England assess the correctness and equivalence of models and rules for figural linear patterns, following engagement with a carefully designed activity sequence. After the students express their own generalisations of the models presented to them in the environment&s;s symbolic language, they engage in a collaborative activity aiming at justifying the correctness of their independent rules and discussing their equivalence. This chapter presents the results from this collaborative activity with data collected from 48 students from three different schools. It demonstrates how the combination of a system that integrates construction with expression and a carefully engineered collaborative task can influence positively students’ justifications for the correctness and equivalence of symbolic expressions, encouraging a structural sense in Algebra.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter describes how 11- to 14-year-old students in England assess the correctness and equivalence of models and rules for figural linear patterns, following engagement with a carefully designed activity sequence. After the students express their own generalisations of the models presented to them in the environment&s;s symbolic language, they engage in a collaborative activity aiming at justifying the correctness of their independent rules and discussing their equivalence. This chapter presents the results from this collaborative activity with data collected from 48 students from three different schools. It demonstrates how the combination of a system that integrates construction with expression and a carefully engineered collaborative task can influence positively students’ justifications for the correctness and equivalence of symbolic expressions, encouraging a structural sense in Algebra.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter describes how 11- to 14-year-old students in England assess the correctness and equivalence of models and rules for figural linear patterns, following engagement with a carefully designed activity sequence. After the students express their own generalisations of the models presented to them in the environment&s;s symbolic language, they engage in a collaborative activity aiming at justifying the correctness of their independent rules and discussing their equivalence. This chapter presents the results from this collaborative activity with data collected from 48 students from three different schools. It demonstrates how the combination of a system that integrates construction with expression and a carefully engineered collaborative task can influence positively students’ justifications for the correctness and equivalence of symbolic expressions, encouraging a structural sense in Algebra.

Key concepts: Correctness, Equivalence (formal languages), Computer science, Algebraic expression, Algebraic number, Symbolic computation, Task (project management), Sequence (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Students' Justification Strategies on the Correctness and Equivalence of Computer-Based Algebraic Expressions — Research Paper | ScholarLens