2022•Periodica Polytechnica Civil EngineeringOpen access

A Comparative Study on Mortar Removal Methods and their Influence on Recycled Aggregate Properties

Jeonghyun Kim, Haneol Jang

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

The adhered mortar attached to recycled aggregate (RA) is one of the main causes of weakening the mechanical properties and durability performance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Therefore, in order to improve the performance of RA and RAC, several methods have been proposed to remove the adhered mortar in RA. However, knowing the adhered mortar content is as important as removing it. This is because concrete mix designs considering the amount of adhered mortar have been proposed and better strength, durability and environmental benefits of these mix designs were reported compared to conventional RAC mix design. Therefore, in this study, the adhered mortar was removed by using two methods of ‘acid treatment’ and ‘chemical and mechanical stress treatment’ for three types of RA, and the test results obtained from each method were comparatively analyzed. The results showed that the adhered mortar contents determined by the two methods were different for the same aggregate, and neither allowed the complete removal of the adhered mortar from RA. It also showed that the test environment of the chemical-mechanical stress method can be harsh enough to damage the original aggregate in RA, and that the acid treatment can cause corrosion of RA depending on the type of aggregate.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The adhered mortar attached to recycled aggregate (RA) is one of the main causes of weakening the mechanical properties and durability performance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Therefore, in order to improve the performance of RA and RAC, several methods have been proposed to remove the adhered mortar in RA. However, knowing the adhered mortar content is as important as removing it. This is because concrete mix designs considering the amount of adhered mortar have been proposed and better strength, durability and environmental benefits of these mix designs were reported compared to conventional RAC mix design. Therefore, in this study, the adhered mortar was removed by using two methods of ‘acid treatment’ and ‘chemical and mechanical stress treatment’ for three types of RA, and the test results obtained from each method were comparatively analyzed. The results showed that the adhered mortar contents determined by the two methods were different for the same aggregate, and neither allowed the complete removal of the adhered mortar from RA. It also showed that the test environment of the chemical-mechanical stress method can be harsh enough to damage the original aggregate in RA, and that the acid treatment can cause corrosion of RA depending on the type of aggregate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The adhered mortar attached to recycled aggregate (RA) is one of the main causes of weakening the mechanical properties and durability performance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Therefore, in order to improve the performance of RA and RAC, several methods have been proposed to remove the adhered mortar in RA. However, knowing the adhered mortar content is as important as removing it. This is because concrete mix designs considering the amount of adhered mortar have been proposed and better strength, durability and environmental benefits of these mix designs were reported compared to conventional RAC mix design. Therefore, in this study, the adhered mortar was removed by using two methods of ‘acid treatment’ and ‘chemical and mechanical stress treatment’ for three types of RA, and the test results obtained from each method were comparatively analyzed. The results showed that the adhered mortar contents determined by the two methods were different for the same aggregate, and neither allowed the complete removal of the adhered mortar from RA. It also showed that the test environment of the chemical-mechanical stress method can be harsh enough to damage the original aggregate in RA, and that the acid treatment can cause corrosion of RA depending on the type of aggregate.

Key concepts: Mortar, Aggregate (composite), Durability, Materials science, Composite material

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparative Study on Mortar Removal Methods and their Influence on Recycled Aggregate Properties — Research Paper | ScholarLens