2022International Journal of Logistics Research and ApplicationsRequires access

Strategic analysis for adopting blockchain technology under supply chain competition

Xue‐Yan Wu, Zhi‐Ping Fan, Guangming Li

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

This paper studies the strategy of adopting blockchain technology (BT) in two supply chains, each consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. We find that the adoption of BT in supply chains is related to consumers’ traceability awareness and the blockchain-based traceability cost-sharing between the manufacturer and retailer. Specifically, when both consumers’ traceability awareness and the proportion of the blockchain-based traceability cost borne by each retailer are low or moderate, the equilibrium strategy could be that one or both supply chains adopt BT. Moreover, when one supply chain adopts BT, the other may be a free rider. When both supply chains adopt BT, one supply chain can gain a competitive advantage when its retailer shares more of the blockchain-based traceability cost than the rival. Counterintuitively, when traceability awareness is high, neither of the two supply chains should adopt BT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper studies the strategy of adopting blockchain technology (BT) in two supply chains, each consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. We find that the adoption of BT in supply chains is related to consumers’ traceability awareness and the blockchain-based traceability cost-sharing between the manufacturer and retailer. Specifically, when both consumers’ traceability awareness and the proportion of the blockchain-based traceability cost borne by each retailer are low or moderate, the equilibrium strategy could be that one or both supply chains adopt BT. Moreover, when one supply chain adopts BT, the other may be a free rider. When both supply chains adopt BT, one supply chain can gain a competitive advantage when its retailer shares more of the blockchain-based traceability cost than the rival. Counterintuitively, when traceability awareness is high, neither of the two supply chains should adopt BT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper studies the strategy of adopting blockchain technology (BT) in two supply chains, each consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer. We find that the adoption of BT in supply chains is related to consumers’ traceability awareness and the blockchain-based traceability cost-sharing between the manufacturer and retailer. Specifically, when both consumers’ traceability awareness and the proportion of the blockchain-based traceability cost borne by each retailer are low or moderate, the equilibrium strategy could be that one or both supply chains adopt BT. Moreover, when one supply chain adopts BT, the other may be a free rider. When both supply chains adopt BT, one supply chain can gain a competitive advantage when its retailer shares more of the blockchain-based traceability cost than the rival. Counterintuitively, when traceability awareness is high, neither of the two supply chains should adopt BT.

Key concepts: Blockchain, Supply chain, Competition (biology), Business, Industrial organization, Supply chain management, Computer science, Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Strategic analysis for adopting blockchain technology under supply chain competition — Research Paper | ScholarLens