2022•Journal of ArrhythmologyOpen access

Long-term results of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with chronic heart failure

A. Yu. Amiraslanov, V. A. Vaskovskiy, Е. А. Artyukhina, Amiran Sh. Revishvili

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Aim. Evaluate the overall effectiveness of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in patients with chronic heart failure of various etiology. Methods. The study included 61 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III), ejection fraction 20-40% and narrow QRS <130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms. Non-ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ and lowering the heart failure class.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim. Evaluate the overall effectiveness of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in patients with chronic heart failure of various etiology. Methods. The study included 61 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III), ejection fraction 20-40% and narrow QRS <130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms. Non-ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ and lowering the heart failure class.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim. Evaluate the overall effectiveness of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in patients with chronic heart failure of various etiology. Methods. The study included 61 patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-III), ejection fraction 20-40% and narrow QRS <130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms, who were implanted the CCM devices. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy prevailed (41 patients). All patients were performed echocardiography, 6-min walk test and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MHFLQ). Results. The observation period was 25 months. All 54 patients significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction from 32.2% to 37.6% (р=0.026) and volume parameters (left ventricle end systolic volume from 150 to 137 ml (р=0.034), left ventricle end diastolic volume from 220 to 201 ml (р=0.044), reduced the heart failure NYHA class >1 in 29 (53.7%) patients (р=0.015), increased 6-min walk test from 265 to 343 m (р=0.029), and the MHFLQ improved from 46.1 to 35.8 (р=0.042). Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ (from 42.7 to 30.3, р=0.029) and lowering the heart failure NYHA class>1 (83.3%, vs 47.2%, p=0.012) compared to ischemic group. Conclusion. CCM is safe and effective in patients with chronic heart failure NYHA class II-III, ejection fraction 20- 40% and narrow QRS˂130 ms. Non-ischemic etiology of cardiomyopathy was associated with significant improvement in MHFLQ and lowering the heart failure class.

Key concepts: Ejection fraction, Medicine, Heart failure, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Ventricle, Contractility, Ischemic cardiomyopathy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Long-term results of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with chronic heart failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens