2022•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Memory and Memorialization after Atrocities

Nicole Fox

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Atrocity crimes tear apart the social fabric of society. One mechanism communities and nations utilize to begin the healing from atrocity crimes is through the development of physical memorials that aim to commemorate a past fraught with trauma and violence. This chapter begins by defining memorialization, memorials, and commemoration and explores why memorials have become a viable option—for communities, nations, and individuals—in the aftermath of atrocity. It examines the three global social and intellectual movements of the 1990s central to the emergence of contemporary memorial culture: the memory boom, the human rights movement, and the justice cascade. Finally, it analyzes the challenges arising during memorialization aimed at reparation and justice. Like all multifaceted mechanisms of transitional justice, memorialization has both promises and pitfalls as both a process and an outcome.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Atrocity crimes tear apart the social fabric of society. One mechanism communities and nations utilize to begin the healing from atrocity crimes is through the development of physical memorials that aim to commemorate a past fraught with trauma and violence. This chapter begins by defining memorialization, memorials, and commemoration and explores why memorials have become a viable option—for communities, nations, and individuals—in the aftermath of atrocity. It examines the three global social and intellectual movements of the 1990s central to the emergence of contemporary memorial culture: the memory boom, the human rights movement, and the justice cascade. Finally, it analyzes the challenges arising during memorialization aimed at reparation and justice. Like all multifaceted mechanisms of transitional justice, memorialization has both promises and pitfalls as both a process and an outcome.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Atrocity crimes tear apart the social fabric of society. One mechanism communities and nations utilize to begin the healing from atrocity crimes is through the development of physical memorials that aim to commemorate a past fraught with trauma and violence. This chapter begins by defining memorialization, memorials, and commemoration and explores why memorials have become a viable option—for communities, nations, and individuals—in the aftermath of atrocity. It examines the three global social and intellectual movements of the 1990s central to the emergence of contemporary memorial culture: the memory boom, the human rights movement, and the justice cascade. Finally, it analyzes the challenges arising during memorialization aimed at reparation and justice. Like all multifaceted mechanisms of transitional justice, memorialization has both promises and pitfalls as both a process and an outcome.

Key concepts: Memorialization, Economic Justice, Criminology, Political science, Human rights, Boom, Law, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Memory and Memorialization after Atrocities — Research Paper | ScholarLens