2022Biosystems EngineeringOpen access

Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data: Introducing two new methods

Hasan Mozaffari, Ali Akbar Moosavi, José Alexandre Melo Demattê

Open full text 41 citations

Abstract

Most soil databases present the mass fractions of sand, silt, and clay particles without detailed primary particle-size distribution (PSD). In the present paper two simple methods are introduced to estimate the PSD using the fractions of sand, silt, clay, and very coarse sand. A total of 504 soil samples with different texture classes from different regions, i.e., southern Iran (245), south-eastern Brazil (116), and UNSODA database (143) were used. PSD of the Iranian and Brazilian soil samples were determined using a combination of wet-sieving and sedimentation (hydrometer for Iranian and pipette for Brazilian soils) approaches and that of the others extracted from UNSODA database. We developed two new methods including very coarse sand-dependent (VCS-D) and very coarse sand-independent (VCS–I) to predict PSD of the soils. PSD were also predicted using the revised Skaggs method (R-Skaggs) and compared with the measured ones. Both VCS-D and VCS-I approaches with very simple equations accurately estimated full range of PSD in a wide range of the fine to medium textured soils)clay, clay loam, loam, silty clay, silty clay loam, silt loam, and silt texture classes). Accuracy of predictions was slightly lower in coarse textured soils (sandy clay, sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sand textures) than that of the other texture classes. For these coarse textured soils, it is strongly recommended that the fraction of particles between 0.05 and 2 mm diameters be estimated using the VCS-D or VCS-I methods and the fraction of particles between 0.002 and 0.05 mm diameters be estimated using the R-Skaggs method. The R-Skaggs method could only predict the PSD in the soils with nearly 25–60% sand content, accurately. Whereas, the new proposed methods could predict full range of PSD with high accuracy (NRMSE <10%) in soils with sand content less than 53%. Overall, the proposed methods could accurately predict full range of PSD curve by using only the content of primary soil particles in nearly 73% of soil classes in texture triangle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most soil databases present the mass fractions of sand, silt, and clay particles without detailed primary particle-size distribution (PSD). In the present paper two simple methods are introduced to estimate the PSD using the fractions of sand, silt, clay, and very coarse sand. A total of 504 soil samples with different texture classes from different regions, i.e., southern Iran (245), south-eastern Brazil (116), and UNSODA database (143) were used. PSD of the Iranian and Brazilian soil samples were determined using a combination of wet-sieving and sedimentation (hydrometer for Iranian and pipette for Brazilian soils) approaches and that of the others extracted from UNSODA database. We developed two new methods including very coarse sand-dependent (VCS-D) and very coarse sand-independent (VCS–I) to predict PSD of the soils. PSD were also predicted using the revised Skaggs method (R-Skaggs) and compared with the measured ones. Both VCS-D and VCS-I approaches with very simple equations accurately estimated full range of PSD in a wide range of the fine to medium textured soils)clay, clay loam, loam, silty clay, silty clay loam, silt loam, and silt texture classes). Accuracy of predictions was slightly lower in coarse textured soils (sandy clay, sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sand textures) than that of the other texture classes. For these coarse textured soils, it is strongly recommended that the fraction of particles between 0.05 and 2 mm diameters be estimated using the VCS-D or VCS-I methods and the fraction of particles between 0.002 and 0.05 mm diameters be estimated using the R-Skaggs method. The R-Skaggs method could only predict the PSD in the soils with nearly 25–60% sand content, accurately. Whereas, the new proposed methods could predict full range of PSD with high accuracy (NRMSE <10%) in soils with sand content less than 53%. Overall, the proposed methods could accurately predict full range of PSD curve by using only the content of primary soil particles in nearly 73% of soil classes in texture triangle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most soil databases present the mass fractions of sand, silt, and clay particles without detailed primary particle-size distribution (PSD). In the present paper two simple methods are introduced to estimate the PSD using the fractions of sand, silt, clay, and very coarse sand. A total of 504 soil samples with different texture classes from different regions, i.e., southern Iran (245), south-eastern Brazil (116), and UNSODA database (143) were used. PSD of the Iranian and Brazilian soil samples were determined using a combination of wet-sieving and sedimentation (hydrometer for Iranian and pipette for Brazilian soils) approaches and that of the others extracted from UNSODA database. We developed two new methods including very coarse sand-dependent (VCS-D) and very coarse sand-independent (VCS–I) to predict PSD of the soils. PSD were also predicted using the revised Skaggs method (R-Skaggs) and compared with the measured ones. Both VCS-D and VCS-I approaches with very simple equations accurately estimated full range of PSD in a wide range of the fine to medium textured soils)clay, clay loam, loam, silty clay, silty clay loam, silt loam, and silt texture classes). Accuracy of predictions was slightly lower in coarse textured soils (sandy clay, sandy clay loam, sandy loam, loamy sand, and sand textures) than that of the other texture classes. For these coarse textured soils, it is strongly recommended that the fraction of particles between 0.05 and 2 mm diameters be estimated using the VCS-D or VCS-I methods and the fraction of particles between 0.002 and 0.05 mm diameters be estimated using the R-Skaggs method. The R-Skaggs method could only predict the PSD in the soils with nearly 25–60% sand content, accurately. Whereas, the new proposed methods could predict full range of PSD with high accuracy (NRMSE <10%) in soils with sand content less than 53%. Overall, the proposed methods could accurately predict full range of PSD curve by using only the content of primary soil particles in nearly 73% of soil classes in texture triangle.

Key concepts: Loam, Soil texture, Silt, Soil water, Soil science, Particle-size distribution, Texture (cosmology), Particle size

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Estimating particle-size distribution from limited soil texture data: Introducing two new methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens