2009IntertaxRequires access

How Does the European Court of Justice Treat Precedents in Its Case Law? Cartesio and Damseaux from a Different Perspective: Part I

Rita Szudoczky

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This article discusses the Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató Bt (hereinafter ‘Cartesio’) case, the latest decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the issue of transfer of seat of companies within the European Union (EU). The analysis of the case is placed to a more general framework, namely the treatment of previous case law by the ECJ, as the Cartesio case follows a controversial line of cases on the freedom of establishment of companies which it was expected to either clarify and confirm or overrule. Thus, the article’s main focus is on how the ECJ dealt with Cartesio in relation to previous case law. In addition, it also compares the ECJ’s approach with that of the Advocate General and it examines the consequences of the case to the right of establishment of EU companies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article discusses the Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató Bt (hereinafter ‘Cartesio’) case, the latest decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the issue of transfer of seat of companies within the European Union (EU). The analysis of the case is placed to a more general framework, namely the treatment of previous case law by the ECJ, as the Cartesio case follows a controversial line of cases on the freedom of establishment of companies which it was expected to either clarify and confirm or overrule. Thus, the article’s main focus is on how the ECJ dealt with Cartesio in relation to previous case law. In addition, it also compares the ECJ’s approach with that of the Advocate General and it examines the consequences of the case to the right of establishment of EU companies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article discusses the Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató Bt (hereinafter ‘Cartesio’) case, the latest decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the issue of transfer of seat of companies within the European Union (EU). The analysis of the case is placed to a more general framework, namely the treatment of previous case law by the ECJ, as the Cartesio case follows a controversial line of cases on the freedom of establishment of companies which it was expected to either clarify and confirm or overrule. Thus, the article’s main focus is on how the ECJ dealt with Cartesio in relation to previous case law. In addition, it also compares the ECJ’s approach with that of the Advocate General and it examines the consequences of the case to the right of establishment of EU companies.

Key concepts: European court of justice, Law, Common law, European Union law, Perspective (graphical), Preliminary ruling, Economic Justice, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Does the European Court of Justice Treat Precedents in Its Case Law? Cartesio and Damseaux from a Different Perspective: Part I — Research Paper | ScholarLens