2022Kidney International ReportsOpen access

POS-046 COMPARISON OF SUSTAINED LOW-EFFICIENCY DIALYSIS (SLED) AND CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY (CRRT) IN ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY: ANALYSIS OF PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED PATIENT COHORT

R K.K., Rajeev A Annigeri

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) is emerging as an alternative to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in recent years as a viable modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, information on the outcome is sparse from the developing countries, where SLED is an attractive alternative to CRRT, in resource-limited situations. We compared the hospital outcome of SLED and CRRT in a propensity score-matched cohort of AKI requiring RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) is emerging as an alternative to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in recent years as a viable modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, information on the outcome is sparse from the developing countries, where SLED is an attractive alternative to CRRT, in resource-limited situations. We compared the hospital outcome of SLED and CRRT in a propensity score-matched cohort of AKI requiring RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) is emerging as an alternative to continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in recent years as a viable modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, information on the outcome is sparse from the developing countries, where SLED is an attractive alternative to CRRT, in resource-limited situations. We compared the hospital outcome of SLED and CRRT in a propensity score-matched cohort of AKI requiring RRT in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Key concepts: Renal replacement therapy, Medicine, Acute kidney injury, Propensity score matching, Dialysis, Intensive care unit, Cohort, Intensive care medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
POS-046 COMPARISON OF SUSTAINED LOW-EFFICIENCY DIALYSIS (SLED) AND CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY (CRRT) IN ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY: ANALYSIS OF PROPENSITY SCORE-MATCHED PATIENT COHORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens