Faculty Opinions recommendation of Store-and-forward teledermatology versus in-person visits: a comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic.
Jonette Keri, Chantal Barland
Abstract
Jonette Keri, Chantal Barland
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of teledermatology in the diagnosis of pediatric skin conditions has not been studied exclusively.OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of a pediatric dermatologist to correctly diagnose rashes by history and digital images.METHODS: Consecutive, new referrals to the pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash were enrolled in the study. A history, demographic data, and digital photographs were obtained from each patient. The data were reviewed by a pediatric dermatologist who made a preliminary diagnosis. The child was then seen in person and a final diagnosis was made. Concordance and kappa values were calculated. Cases of diagnostic disagreement were analyzed for their effect on management.RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. Diagnostic concordance was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%), and the kappa value was 0.80. Clinically relevant disagreement occurred in 12% of cases.LIMITATIONS: The study was performed at a single site, theoretically limiting generalizability.CONCLUSION: Teledermatology appears to have a useful role in the care of children with rashes. PMID: 19362751
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: The role of teledermatology in the diagnosis of pediatric skin conditions has not been studied exclusively.OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of a pediatric dermatologist to correctly diagnose rashes by history and digital images.METHODS: Consecutive, new referrals to the pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash were enrolled in the study. A history, demographic data, and digital photographs were obtained from each patient. The data were reviewed by a pediatric dermatologist who made a preliminary diagnosis. The child was then seen in person and a final diagnosis was made. Concordance and kappa values were calculated. Cases of diagnostic disagreement were analyzed for their effect on management.RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. Diagnostic concordance was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%), and the kappa value was 0.80. Clinically relevant disagreement occurred in 12% of cases.LIMITATIONS: The study was performed at a single site, theoretically limiting generalizability.CONCLUSION: Teledermatology appears to have a useful role in the care of children with rashes. PMID: 19362751
Key concepts: Teledermatology, Concordance, Medicine, Rash, Generalizability theory, Pediatrics, Confidence interval, Limiting