2009Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical LiteratureRequires access

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Store-and-forward teledermatology versus in-person visits: a comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic.

Jonette Keri, Chantal Barland

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of teledermatology in the diagnosis of pediatric skin conditions has not been studied exclusively.OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of a pediatric dermatologist to correctly diagnose rashes by history and digital images.METHODS: Consecutive, new referrals to the pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash were enrolled in the study. A history, demographic data, and digital photographs were obtained from each patient. The data were reviewed by a pediatric dermatologist who made a preliminary diagnosis. The child was then seen in person and a final diagnosis was made. Concordance and kappa values were calculated. Cases of diagnostic disagreement were analyzed for their effect on management.RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. Diagnostic concordance was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%), and the kappa value was 0.80. Clinically relevant disagreement occurred in 12% of cases.LIMITATIONS: The study was performed at a single site, theoretically limiting generalizability.CONCLUSION: Teledermatology appears to have a useful role in the care of children with rashes. PMID: 19362751

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The role of teledermatology in the diagnosis of pediatric skin conditions has not been studied exclusively.OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of a pediatric dermatologist to correctly diagnose rashes by history and digital images.METHODS: Consecutive, new referrals to the pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash were enrolled in the study. A history, demographic data, and digital photographs were obtained from each patient. The data were reviewed by a pediatric dermatologist who made a preliminary diagnosis. The child was then seen in person and a final diagnosis was made. Concordance and kappa values were calculated. Cases of diagnostic disagreement were analyzed for their effect on management.RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. Diagnostic concordance was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%), and the kappa value was 0.80. Clinically relevant disagreement occurred in 12% of cases.LIMITATIONS: The study was performed at a single site, theoretically limiting generalizability.CONCLUSION: Teledermatology appears to have a useful role in the care of children with rashes. PMID: 19362751

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of teledermatology in the diagnosis of pediatric skin conditions has not been studied exclusively.OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of a pediatric dermatologist to correctly diagnose rashes by history and digital images.METHODS: Consecutive, new referrals to the pediatric dermatology clinic with a rash were enrolled in the study. A history, demographic data, and digital photographs were obtained from each patient. The data were reviewed by a pediatric dermatologist who made a preliminary diagnosis. The child was then seen in person and a final diagnosis was made. Concordance and kappa values were calculated. Cases of diagnostic disagreement were analyzed for their effect on management.RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. Diagnostic concordance was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-88%), and the kappa value was 0.80. Clinically relevant disagreement occurred in 12% of cases.LIMITATIONS: The study was performed at a single site, theoretically limiting generalizability.CONCLUSION: Teledermatology appears to have a useful role in the care of children with rashes. PMID: 19362751

Key concepts: Teledermatology, Concordance, Medicine, Rash, Generalizability theory, Pediatrics, Confidence interval, Limiting

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Faculty Opinions recommendation of Store-and-forward teledermatology versus in-person visits: a comparison in pediatric teledermatology clinic. — Research Paper | ScholarLens