2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

LPs of Choice: Fund of Funds

Mahendra Ramsinghani

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Some large, really large institutional investors (like pension funds and endowments) invest in venture capital funds using an indirect investment approach. They pick an intermediary — a fund of funds (FoF) — as opposed to investing in venture funds directly. The FoF model was established to meet the asset allocation and diversification demands of larger financial institutions. To institutional investors, a fund of funds offers the following advantages: efficiency, access, diversification, and cost structure. This chapter looks at several FoF, each focused on venture capital funds, yet their investment strategy differs based on focus, geography, capital under management, and value provided to their fund portfolio. In comparing all limited partner (LP) types, the fund-of-funds model stands apart from classical institutional LPs such as endowments/pension funds because they bring a much higher level of insights, context, and intellectual rigor to the business.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some large, really large institutional investors (like pension funds and endowments) invest in venture capital funds using an indirect investment approach. They pick an intermediary — a fund of funds (FoF) — as opposed to investing in venture funds directly. The FoF model was established to meet the asset allocation and diversification demands of larger financial institutions. To institutional investors, a fund of funds offers the following advantages: efficiency, access, diversification, and cost structure. This chapter looks at several FoF, each focused on venture capital funds, yet their investment strategy differs based on focus, geography, capital under management, and value provided to their fund portfolio. In comparing all limited partner (LP) types, the fund-of-funds model stands apart from classical institutional LPs such as endowments/pension funds because they bring a much higher level of insights, context, and intellectual rigor to the business.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some large, really large institutional investors (like pension funds and endowments) invest in venture capital funds using an indirect investment approach. They pick an intermediary — a fund of funds (FoF) — as opposed to investing in venture funds directly. The FoF model was established to meet the asset allocation and diversification demands of larger financial institutions. To institutional investors, a fund of funds offers the following advantages: efficiency, access, diversification, and cost structure. This chapter looks at several FoF, each focused on venture capital funds, yet their investment strategy differs based on focus, geography, capital under management, and value provided to their fund portfolio. In comparing all limited partner (LP) types, the fund-of-funds model stands apart from classical institutional LPs such as endowments/pension funds because they bring a much higher level of insights, context, and intellectual rigor to the business.

Key concepts: Fund of funds, Global assets under management, Institutional investor, Closed-end fund, Finance, Passive management, Diversification (marketing strategy), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LPs of Choice: Fund of Funds — Research Paper | ScholarLens