2022Peritoneal Dialysis InternationalRequires access

Comparison between the ‘pull technique’ and open surgery for peritoneal catheter removal in Chinese patients on peritoneal dialysis

Yunxin Dai, Han-cheng Guo, Tingmin Li, Chun-meng Yao, Zugang Xie, Fuzhen Wang, Cuiwei Yao, Tianjun Guan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The removal techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are open surgical dissection (OD) and the ‘pull technique’ (PT). The latter is limitedly used because of uncertainty about its feasibility and safety. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and complications between the two techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent PD catheter removal from January 2015 to January 2021 in four PD centres in China. The patients were grouped according to the different removal techniques and were followed up to observe the potential complications. Results: The demographic characteristics of patients in the PT ( n = 68) and OD ( n = 44) groups showed no significant difference. The indications for PD catheter removal were similar between the two groups, except for a higher frequency of peritonitis in the OD group ( p = 0.010). In the PT group, the main complications were broken catheter (7.4%), superficial cuff infection (4.8%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.8%). In the OD group, the main complications were death (9.1%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.6%). Conclusion: PT might be a safe and reliable technique for PD catheter removal compared to OD. Considering its simple and non-invasive nature, PT should be recommended as the alternative to OD in suitable PD patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The removal techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are open surgical dissection (OD) and the ‘pull technique’ (PT). The latter is limitedly used because of uncertainty about its feasibility and safety. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and complications between the two techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent PD catheter removal from January 2015 to January 2021 in four PD centres in China. The patients were grouped according to the different removal techniques and were followed up to observe the potential complications. Results: The demographic characteristics of patients in the PT ( n = 68) and OD ( n = 44) groups showed no significant difference. The indications for PD catheter removal were similar between the two groups, except for a higher frequency of peritonitis in the OD group ( p = 0.010). In the PT group, the main complications were broken catheter (7.4%), superficial cuff infection (4.8%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.8%). In the OD group, the main complications were death (9.1%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.6%). Conclusion: PT might be a safe and reliable technique for PD catheter removal compared to OD. Considering its simple and non-invasive nature, PT should be recommended as the alternative to OD in suitable PD patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The removal techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters are open surgical dissection (OD) and the ‘pull technique’ (PT). The latter is limitedly used because of uncertainty about its feasibility and safety. This study aimed to compare the outcomes and complications between the two techniques. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent PD catheter removal from January 2015 to January 2021 in four PD centres in China. The patients were grouped according to the different removal techniques and were followed up to observe the potential complications. Results: The demographic characteristics of patients in the PT ( n = 68) and OD ( n = 44) groups showed no significant difference. The indications for PD catheter removal were similar between the two groups, except for a higher frequency of peritonitis in the OD group ( p = 0.010). In the PT group, the main complications were broken catheter (7.4%), superficial cuff infection (4.8%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.8%). In the OD group, the main complications were death (9.1%) and subcutaneous bleeding (4.6%). Conclusion: PT might be a safe and reliable technique for PD catheter removal compared to OD. Considering its simple and non-invasive nature, PT should be recommended as the alternative to OD in suitable PD patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Peritoneal dialysis, Peritonitis, Surgery, Catheter, Cuff, Retrospective cohort study, Dissection (medical)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between the ‘pull technique’ and open surgery for peritoneal catheter removal in Chinese patients on peritoneal dialysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens