1992JAMARequires access

Accuracy in recorded diagnoses

Stephen F. Jencks

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Although making accurate diagnoses is a critical clinical skill, putting accurate diagnoses on the face sheet of a medical record does not have the same priority for most physicians. Even those who see recording a correct principal diagnosis as an important part of good clinical thinking are unlikely to be perfectionists regarding additional diagnoses because it is hard to see that they will have any effect on patient care. See also p 2197. In the last few years, however, major journals have published a growing number of articles in which recorded additional diagnoses play an important part in analysis, either to establish a clinical point or to assess additional diagnoses as a measure of clinical severity of illness. Investigators seek to secure information from additional diagnoses, which would otherwise require costly manual abstraction, about the occurrence of adverse events and the risk of outcomes such as death. In addition, hospital

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although making accurate diagnoses is a critical clinical skill, putting accurate diagnoses on the face sheet of a medical record does not have the same priority for most physicians. Even those who see recording a correct principal diagnosis as an important part of good clinical thinking are unlikely to be perfectionists regarding additional diagnoses because it is hard to see that they will have any effect on patient care. See also p 2197. In the last few years, however, major journals have published a growing number of articles in which recorded additional diagnoses play an important part in analysis, either to establish a clinical point or to assess additional diagnoses as a measure of clinical severity of illness. Investigators seek to secure information from additional diagnoses, which would otherwise require costly manual abstraction, about the occurrence of adverse events and the risk of outcomes such as death. In addition, hospital

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although making accurate diagnoses is a critical clinical skill, putting accurate diagnoses on the face sheet of a medical record does not have the same priority for most physicians. Even those who see recording a correct principal diagnosis as an important part of good clinical thinking are unlikely to be perfectionists regarding additional diagnoses because it is hard to see that they will have any effect on patient care. See also p 2197. In the last few years, however, major journals have published a growing number of articles in which recorded additional diagnoses play an important part in analysis, either to establish a clinical point or to assess additional diagnoses as a measure of clinical severity of illness. Investigators seek to secure information from additional diagnoses, which would otherwise require costly manual abstraction, about the occurrence of adverse events and the risk of outcomes such as death. In addition, hospital

Key concepts: Medical diagnosis, Medicine, Medical record, Medical emergency, MEDLINE, Intensive care medicine, Pathology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accuracy in recorded diagnoses — Research Paper | ScholarLens