2022•Unpublished venueOpen access

Net primary production and ecosystem carbon flux of Brazilian tropical savanna ecosystems from eddy covariance and inventory methods

George Louis Vourlitis, Osvaldo Borges Pinto, Higo J. Dalmagro, Paulo Henrique Zanella de Arruda, Francisco de Almeida Lobo, José de Souza Nogueira

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Estimates of net primary (NPP) and ecosystem production (NEP) are needed for tropical savanna, which is structurally diverse but understudied compared to tropical rainforest. Estimates of NPP and NEP are available from eddy covariance and inventory methods, but both approaches have errors and uncertainties. We used both methods to estimate carbon (C) fluxes for an upland mixed grassland and a seasonally flooded forest to determine the correspondence in C cycling components derived from these methods and assess the contribution of the various C cycling components to the overall NEP. Both techniques provided similar estimates of NPP, NEP, and gross primary production (GPP). Belowground NPP accounted for 49-53% of the total NPP for both ecosystems, followed by aboveground litter (26-27%) and wood (16-17%) production. Increases in water availability increased the potential for C storage, but the mechanism was different in the savanna types with an increase in soil moisture causing higher NPP in the mixed grassland but lower ecosystem respiration (R eco ) in the Cerrado forest. Compared to other savanna ecosystems, the mixed grassland had a similar rate of R eco but lower productivity and C use efficiency (CUE = NPP/GPP = 0.28). The Cerrado forest had a high CUE (0.58) and similar C flux rates to other tropical savanna forests and woodlands. While our measurements are spatially and temporally limited, the agreement in C fluxes estimated using inventory and eddy covariance methods suggest that the C cycle estimates for these savanna ecosystems are robust.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Estimates of net primary (NPP) and ecosystem production (NEP) are needed for tropical savanna, which is structurally diverse but understudied compared to tropical rainforest. Estimates of NPP and NEP are available from eddy covariance and inventory methods, but both approaches have errors and uncertainties. We used both methods to estimate carbon (C) fluxes for an upland mixed grassland and a seasonally flooded forest to determine the correspondence in C cycling components derived from these methods and assess the contribution of the various C cycling components to the overall NEP. Both techniques provided similar estimates of NPP, NEP, and gross primary production (GPP). Belowground NPP accounted for 49-53% of the total NPP for both ecosystems, followed by aboveground litter (26-27%) and wood (16-17%) production. Increases in water availability increased the potential for C storage, but the mechanism was different in the savanna types with an increase in soil moisture causing higher NPP in the mixed grassland but lower ecosystem respiration (R eco ) in the Cerrado forest. Compared to other savanna ecosystems, the mixed grassland had a similar rate of R eco but lower productivity and C use efficiency (CUE = NPP/GPP = 0.28). The Cerrado forest had a high CUE (0.58) and similar C flux rates to other tropical savanna forests and woodlands. While our measurements are spatially and temporally limited, the agreement in C fluxes estimated using inventory and eddy covariance methods suggest that the C cycle estimates for these savanna ecosystems are robust.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Estimates of net primary (NPP) and ecosystem production (NEP) are needed for tropical savanna, which is structurally diverse but understudied compared to tropical rainforest. Estimates of NPP and NEP are available from eddy covariance and inventory methods, but both approaches have errors and uncertainties. We used both methods to estimate carbon (C) fluxes for an upland mixed grassland and a seasonally flooded forest to determine the correspondence in C cycling components derived from these methods and assess the contribution of the various C cycling components to the overall NEP. Both techniques provided similar estimates of NPP, NEP, and gross primary production (GPP). Belowground NPP accounted for 49-53% of the total NPP for both ecosystems, followed by aboveground litter (26-27%) and wood (16-17%) production. Increases in water availability increased the potential for C storage, but the mechanism was different in the savanna types with an increase in soil moisture causing higher NPP in the mixed grassland but lower ecosystem respiration (R eco ) in the Cerrado forest. Compared to other savanna ecosystems, the mixed grassland had a similar rate of R eco but lower productivity and C use efficiency (CUE = NPP/GPP = 0.28). The Cerrado forest had a high CUE (0.58) and similar C flux rates to other tropical savanna forests and woodlands. While our measurements are spatially and temporally limited, the agreement in C fluxes estimated using inventory and eddy covariance methods suggest that the C cycle estimates for these savanna ecosystems are robust.

Key concepts: Eddy covariance, Primary production, Environmental science, Ecosystem respiration, Ecosystem, Carbon cycle, Grassland, Tropical savanna climate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Net primary production and ecosystem carbon flux of Brazilian tropical savanna ecosystems from eddy covariance and inventory methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens