1976•PEDIATRICSRequires access

Helpful Hint From a Sage

Reginald Lightwood

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Most pediatricians question the wisdom of random use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in children. However, there are still many physicians who make routine recourse to such treatment, perhaps without awareness that most upper respiratory tract infections are viral illnesses unaffected by antibiotic treatment. The results and conclusions by Soyka et al.1 provide good evidence. Their conclusions are that "Indiscriminate antibiotic therapy cannot substitute for proper diagnostic evaluation of the patient who may have a bacterial or, far more likely, a viral illness."

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Most pediatricians question the wisdom of random use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in children. However, there are still many physicians who make routine recourse to such treatment, perhaps without awareness that most upper respiratory tract infections are viral illnesses unaffected by antibiotic treatment. The results and conclusions by Soyka et al.1 provide good evidence. Their conclusions are that "Indiscriminate antibiotic therapy cannot substitute for proper diagnostic evaluation of the patient who may have a bacterial or, far more likely, a viral illness."

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Most pediatricians question the wisdom of random use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections in children. However, there are still many physicians who make routine recourse to such treatment, perhaps without awareness that most upper respiratory tract infections are viral illnesses unaffected by antibiotic treatment. The results and conclusions by Soyka et al.1 provide good evidence. Their conclusions are that "Indiscriminate antibiotic therapy cannot substitute for proper diagnostic evaluation of the patient who may have a bacterial or, far more likely, a viral illness."

Key concepts: Medicine, Antibiotics, Respiratory tract infections, Intensive care medicine, Antibiotic therapy, Respiratory tract, Upper respiratory tract infection, Viral infection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Helpful Hint From a Sage — Research Paper | ScholarLens