2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Managerial Compensation

Kose John, Samir Saadi

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This chapter surveys the recent literature on managerial compensation, focusing on the main issues that spurred intense debate in the popular press, academia, and from regulatory agencies. In particular, the literature review discusses whether the high levels of executive compensation are justifiable, and whether executive compensation schemes induce unethical behavior by executives. While most of the empirical evidence supports the view that the high levels of executive compensation are excessive and unethical, an emerging stream of literature provides rational explanations for the observed levels of executive pay. Ample evidence also shows that some compensation packages induce executives to manipulate their pay. This chapter also summarizes a limited, but growing, literature linking managerial compensation to corporate social responsibility. This literature suggests that the structure of managerial compensation matters to corporate social performance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter surveys the recent literature on managerial compensation, focusing on the main issues that spurred intense debate in the popular press, academia, and from regulatory agencies. In particular, the literature review discusses whether the high levels of executive compensation are justifiable, and whether executive compensation schemes induce unethical behavior by executives. While most of the empirical evidence supports the view that the high levels of executive compensation are excessive and unethical, an emerging stream of literature provides rational explanations for the observed levels of executive pay. Ample evidence also shows that some compensation packages induce executives to manipulate their pay. This chapter also summarizes a limited, but growing, literature linking managerial compensation to corporate social responsibility. This literature suggests that the structure of managerial compensation matters to corporate social performance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter surveys the recent literature on managerial compensation, focusing on the main issues that spurred intense debate in the popular press, academia, and from regulatory agencies. In particular, the literature review discusses whether the high levels of executive compensation are justifiable, and whether executive compensation schemes induce unethical behavior by executives. While most of the empirical evidence supports the view that the high levels of executive compensation are excessive and unethical, an emerging stream of literature provides rational explanations for the observed levels of executive pay. Ample evidence also shows that some compensation packages induce executives to manipulate their pay. This chapter also summarizes a limited, but growing, literature linking managerial compensation to corporate social responsibility. This literature suggests that the structure of managerial compensation matters to corporate social performance.

Key concepts: Executive compensation, Compensation (psychology), Accounting, Corporate social responsibility, Empirical evidence, Business, Public relations, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Managerial Compensation — Research Paper | ScholarLens