2022IEEE Control SystemsRequires access

Demystifying Enigmatic Undershoot in Setpoint Command Following [Focus on Education]

Mohammadreza Kamaldar, Syed Aseem Ul Islam, Jesse B. Hoagg, Dennis S. Bernstein

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

It often occurs in practice that the response to a step input or setpoint command moves initially in a direction that is opposite to the direction of the asymptotic response. In many real-world applications, this phenomenon—called initial undershoot—presents a fundamental limitation on control system performance. Although the basic mechanism responsible for initial undershoot, namely, an odd number of real, positive zeros, is well understood, it is surprising that, as the setpoint changes, initial undershoot may appear or disappear for the same plant dynamics. The goal of this tutorial note is to investigate the causes of this puzzling phenomenon. In particular, for setpoint command following with a changing setpoint, this article shows (spoiler alert) that the internal state when the setpoint changes determines the presence or absence of initial undershoot. Complete proofs for both initial and delayed undershoot in both continuous time and discrete-time systems are given to make the article self-contained and useful for students and instructors of systems and control theory

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It often occurs in practice that the response to a step input or setpoint command moves initially in a direction that is opposite to the direction of the asymptotic response. In many real-world applications, this phenomenon—called initial undershoot—presents a fundamental limitation on control system performance. Although the basic mechanism responsible for initial undershoot, namely, an odd number of real, positive zeros, is well understood, it is surprising that, as the setpoint changes, initial undershoot may appear or disappear for the same plant dynamics. The goal of this tutorial note is to investigate the causes of this puzzling phenomenon. In particular, for setpoint command following with a changing setpoint, this article shows (spoiler alert) that the internal state when the setpoint changes determines the presence or absence of initial undershoot. Complete proofs for both initial and delayed undershoot in both continuous time and discrete-time systems are given to make the article self-contained and useful for students and instructors of systems and control theory

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It often occurs in practice that the response to a step input or setpoint command moves initially in a direction that is opposite to the direction of the asymptotic response. In many real-world applications, this phenomenon—called initial undershoot—presents a fundamental limitation on control system performance. Although the basic mechanism responsible for initial undershoot, namely, an odd number of real, positive zeros, is well understood, it is surprising that, as the setpoint changes, initial undershoot may appear or disappear for the same plant dynamics. The goal of this tutorial note is to investigate the causes of this puzzling phenomenon. In particular, for setpoint command following with a changing setpoint, this article shows (spoiler alert) that the internal state when the setpoint changes determines the presence or absence of initial undershoot. Complete proofs for both initial and delayed undershoot in both continuous time and discrete-time systems are given to make the article self-contained and useful for students and instructors of systems and control theory

Key concepts: Setpoint, Control theory (sociology), Control (management), Computer science, Focus (optics), Mathematical proof, Phenomenon, Controller (irrigation)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Demystifying Enigmatic Undershoot in Setpoint Command Following [Focus on Education] — Research Paper | ScholarLens