ScholarLens Back to search
1946•Harvard Law ReviewRequires access

Banks and Banking. Regulation. Investment Bankers Held Not "Primarily Engaged" in Underwriting Since That Was Not Largest Single Item of Business

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Banks and Banking. Regulation. Investment Bankers Held Not "Primarily Engaged" in Underwriting Since That Was Not Largest Single Item of Business, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 5 (May, 1946), pp. 798-799

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Banks and Banking. Regulation. Investment Bankers Held Not "Primarily Engaged" in Underwriting Since That Was Not Largest Single Item of Business, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 5 (May, 1946), pp. 798-799

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Banks and Banking. Regulation. Investment Bankers Held Not "Primarily Engaged" in Underwriting Since That Was Not Largest Single Item of Business, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 59, No. 5 (May, 1946), pp. 798-799

Key concepts: Underwriting, Investment banking, Business, Financial system, Accounting, Investment (military), Retail banking, Finance

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Banks and Banking. Regulation. Investment Bankers Held Not "Primarily Engaged" in Underwriting Since That Was Not Largest Single Item of Business — Research Paper | ScholarLens