2022PsychophysiologyRequires access

An EEG study of the combined effects of top‐down and bottom‐up attentional selection under varying task difficulty

Einat Rashal, Mehdi Senoussi, Elisa Santandrea, Suliann Ben Hamed, Emiliano Macaluso, Leonardo Chelazzi, C. Nico Boehler

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examined the effect of combined top‐down and bottom‐up attentional control sources, using known attention‐related EEG components that are thought to reflect target selection (N2pc) and distractor suppression (P D ). We used endogenous cues (valid vs. neutral) for top‐down attentional control, and salience in the form of color singletons (either the target or a distractor) for bottom‐up attentional control in visual search. Crucially, in two experiments, the task was of increasing difficulty, reporting the orientation of a tilted target (Experiment 1), or the position of a small gap within the target among tilted non‐targets (Experiment 2). Our results showed strong cueing effects on RT and accuracy in both experiments, demonstrating a general facilitation of responses to validly cued targets. Whereas the processing of salient targets was not improved compared with non‐salient targets, the presence of a salient distractor consistently worsened performance. The N2pc and P D were only observed in trials where targets were preceded by neutral cues in Experiment 1, and for validly cued targets and salient neutrally cued targets in Experiment 2. A cueing effect was found on the P D in Experiment 1, showing an amplitude reduction in trials where the target was validly cued. These results support the idea that bottom‐up attentional allocation occurs only when top‐down allocation of attention is absent or inefficient. Therefore, these results indicate that attentional selection and suppression during visual search are both influenced by top‐down cueing and give support to theories that focus on the interaction between the two types of attention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract We examined the effect of combined top‐down and bottom‐up attentional control sources, using known attention‐related EEG components that are thought to reflect target selection (N2pc) and distractor suppression (P D ). We used endogenous cues (valid vs. neutral) for top‐down attentional control, and salience in the form of color singletons (either the target or a distractor) for bottom‐up attentional control in visual search. Crucially, in two experiments, the task was of increasing difficulty, reporting the orientation of a tilted target (Experiment 1), or the position of a small gap within the target among tilted non‐targets (Experiment 2). Our results showed strong cueing effects on RT and accuracy in both experiments, demonstrating a general facilitation of responses to validly cued targets. Whereas the processing of salient targets was not improved compared with non‐salient targets, the presence of a salient distractor consistently worsened performance. The N2pc and P D were only observed in trials where targets were preceded by neutral cues in Experiment 1, and for validly cued targets and salient neutrally cued targets in Experiment 2. A cueing effect was found on the P D in Experiment 1, showing an amplitude reduction in trials where the target was validly cued. These results support the idea that bottom‐up attentional allocation occurs only when top‐down allocation of attention is absent or inefficient. Therefore, these results indicate that attentional selection and suppression during visual search are both influenced by top‐down cueing and give support to theories that focus on the interaction between the two types of attention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract We examined the effect of combined top‐down and bottom‐up attentional control sources, using known attention‐related EEG components that are thought to reflect target selection (N2pc) and distractor suppression (P D ). We used endogenous cues (valid vs. neutral) for top‐down attentional control, and salience in the form of color singletons (either the target or a distractor) for bottom‐up attentional control in visual search. Crucially, in two experiments, the task was of increasing difficulty, reporting the orientation of a tilted target (Experiment 1), or the position of a small gap within the target among tilted non‐targets (Experiment 2). Our results showed strong cueing effects on RT and accuracy in both experiments, demonstrating a general facilitation of responses to validly cued targets. Whereas the processing of salient targets was not improved compared with non‐salient targets, the presence of a salient distractor consistently worsened performance. The N2pc and P D were only observed in trials where targets were preceded by neutral cues in Experiment 1, and for validly cued targets and salient neutrally cued targets in Experiment 2. A cueing effect was found on the P D in Experiment 1, showing an amplitude reduction in trials where the target was validly cued. These results support the idea that bottom‐up attentional allocation occurs only when top‐down allocation of attention is absent or inefficient. Therefore, these results indicate that attentional selection and suppression during visual search are both influenced by top‐down cueing and give support to theories that focus on the interaction between the two types of attention.

Key concepts: Cued speech, N2pc, Psychology, Attentional control, Visual search, Salience (neuroscience), Electroencephalography, Inhibition of return

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An EEG study of the combined effects of top‐down and bottom‐up attentional selection under varying task difficulty — Research Paper | ScholarLens