Professional Arbitrage
Andrei Shleifer
Abstract
Andrei Shleifer
Abstract
Abstract Considers noise trader risk in the agency context of professional arbitrage. It elaborates on a performance‐based arbitrage model where arbitrageurs are affected by the inability of their investors to separate luck from skill, shedding further doubt on the effectiveness of arbitrage in achieving market efficiency. At the end, the chapter also briefly discusses the turbulence of financial markets in the summer of 1998, when Russia defaulted most of its debt, which vividly illustrated the limits of arbitrage.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Considers noise trader risk in the agency context of professional arbitrage. It elaborates on a performance‐based arbitrage model where arbitrageurs are affected by the inability of their investors to separate luck from skill, shedding further doubt on the effectiveness of arbitrage in achieving market efficiency. At the end, the chapter also briefly discusses the turbulence of financial markets in the summer of 1998, when Russia defaulted most of its debt, which vividly illustrated the limits of arbitrage.
Key concepts: Arbitrage, Risk arbitrage, Fixed income arbitrage, Index arbitrage, Financial economics, Statistical arbitrage, Debt, Context (archaeology)