2021Unpublished venueRequires access

IEC 61508 and ISO 26262 – A Comparison Study

Abdellatif Nouri, Jens Warmuth

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

In the process of realizing safety critical systems, guaranteeing functional safety is always mandatory. However, multiple factors are challenging functional safety: (i) the complexity of new electrical and electronic architecture leading to different malfunctioning behavior. This malfunctioning behavior can lead to unwanted hazards and then to unreasonable risk, (ii) the availability of various functional safety standards and (iii) high expenses. If functional safety standards are used in the design of a safety critical system, it is important to evaluate the risk accurately. The risk is related to the probability of failure. In this paper, a comparison between two functional safety standards ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 is presented. These standards are used in the automotive field and in the industrial automation field, respectively. Additionally, a limitation in using IEC 61508 to verify ISO 26262 is emphasized. Focus is the safety lifecycle and the failure rate evaluation methods, which are applied by the two standards. The comparison made in this paper represents the opinion of the authors based on their experience and is not intended to be absolute.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the process of realizing safety critical systems, guaranteeing functional safety is always mandatory. However, multiple factors are challenging functional safety: (i) the complexity of new electrical and electronic architecture leading to different malfunctioning behavior. This malfunctioning behavior can lead to unwanted hazards and then to unreasonable risk, (ii) the availability of various functional safety standards and (iii) high expenses. If functional safety standards are used in the design of a safety critical system, it is important to evaluate the risk accurately. The risk is related to the probability of failure. In this paper, a comparison between two functional safety standards ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 is presented. These standards are used in the automotive field and in the industrial automation field, respectively. Additionally, a limitation in using IEC 61508 to verify ISO 26262 is emphasized. Focus is the safety lifecycle and the failure rate evaluation methods, which are applied by the two standards. The comparison made in this paper represents the opinion of the authors based on their experience and is not intended to be absolute.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the process of realizing safety critical systems, guaranteeing functional safety is always mandatory. However, multiple factors are challenging functional safety: (i) the complexity of new electrical and electronic architecture leading to different malfunctioning behavior. This malfunctioning behavior can lead to unwanted hazards and then to unreasonable risk, (ii) the availability of various functional safety standards and (iii) high expenses. If functional safety standards are used in the design of a safety critical system, it is important to evaluate the risk accurately. The risk is related to the probability of failure. In this paper, a comparison between two functional safety standards ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 is presented. These standards are used in the automotive field and in the industrial automation field, respectively. Additionally, a limitation in using IEC 61508 to verify ISO 26262 is emphasized. Focus is the safety lifecycle and the failure rate evaluation methods, which are applied by the two standards. The comparison made in this paper represents the opinion of the authors based on their experience and is not intended to be absolute.

Key concepts: Functional safety, IEC 61508, Risk analysis (engineering), Reliability engineering, Computer science, Automation, Automotive industry, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IEC 61508 and ISO 26262 – A Comparison Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens