2022•Research SquareOpen access

Lymphocele or Seroma After Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Adrien Crestani, Katia Mahiou, Marie-Lucile Bodet, Alice Roosen, Bonneau Claire, Rouzier Roman

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using a standardised tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1,766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR= 0.86; 95%CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR= 0.96; 95%CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR= 1.88; 95%CI [1.43, 2.48). To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using a standardised tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1,766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR= 0.86; 95%CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR= 0.96; 95%CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR= 1.88; 95%CI [1.43, 2.48). To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using a standardised tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1,766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR= 0.86; 95%CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR= 0.96; 95%CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR= 1.88; 95%CI [1.43, 2.48). To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique.

Key concepts: Lymphocele, Seroma, Medicine, Mastectomy, Breast cancer, Lymphadenectomy, Cochrane Library, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Lymphocele or Seroma After Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. — Research Paper | ScholarLens