2022Unpublished venueOpen access

Impact of different selection approaches for identifying Lynch Syndrome-related colorectalcancer patients: unity is strength

Antonio Russo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited genetic condition associated with increased predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumors and is caused by germline mutations in Mismatch Repair (MMR) or EPCAM genes. The identification of LS carriers is currently based on germline testing of subjects with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors or fulfilling clinical criteria, but the most efficient strategies to select patients who should be offered genetic testing are yet not well defined. Patients and Methods In order to assess the most suitable selection mode to identify LS-related CRC patients, we retrospectively collected and analyzed all clinical and molecular information of 854 CRC patients, recruited from 2013 to 2021 at the University Hospital Policlinico “P. Giaccone” of Palermo (Italy), 100 of which were selected based on revised Bethesda guidelines, Amsterdam criteria II, or tissue MMR deficiency, and genetically tested for germline variants in LS- susceptibility genes. Results Our study showed that 32 out of 100 CRC patients harboured germline likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in MMR genes. Conclusions The analysis of tissue microsatellite instability (MSI) status according to the revised Bethesda guidelines has been to be the best selection approach. However, using different selection approaches as complementary strategies is useful to identify LS carriers, reducing underdiagnosis of this syndrome. Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Germline mutations; Lynch Syndrome; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch Repair genes; MLH1; MMR-deficiency; MSH2; Dichirons2021

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited genetic condition associated with increased predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumors and is caused by germline mutations in Mismatch Repair (MMR) or EPCAM genes. The identification of LS carriers is currently based on germline testing of subjects with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors or fulfilling clinical criteria, but the most efficient strategies to select patients who should be offered genetic testing are yet not well defined. Patients and Methods In order to assess the most suitable selection mode to identify LS-related CRC patients, we retrospectively collected and analyzed all clinical and molecular information of 854 CRC patients, recruited from 2013 to 2021 at the University Hospital Policlinico “P. Giaccone” of Palermo (Italy), 100 of which were selected based on revised Bethesda guidelines, Amsterdam criteria II, or tissue MMR deficiency, and genetically tested for germline variants in LS- susceptibility genes. Results Our study showed that 32 out of 100 CRC patients harboured germline likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in MMR genes. Conclusions The analysis of tissue microsatellite instability (MSI) status according to the revised Bethesda guidelines has been to be the best selection approach. However, using different selection approaches as complementary strategies is useful to identify LS carriers, reducing underdiagnosis of this syndrome. Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Germline mutations; Lynch Syndrome; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch Repair genes; MLH1; MMR-deficiency; MSH2; Dichirons2021

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited genetic condition associated with increased predisposition to colorectal cancer (CRC) and other tumors and is caused by germline mutations in Mismatch Repair (MMR) or EPCAM genes. The identification of LS carriers is currently based on germline testing of subjects with MMR-deficient (dMMR) tumors or fulfilling clinical criteria, but the most efficient strategies to select patients who should be offered genetic testing are yet not well defined. Patients and Methods In order to assess the most suitable selection mode to identify LS-related CRC patients, we retrospectively collected and analyzed all clinical and molecular information of 854 CRC patients, recruited from 2013 to 2021 at the University Hospital Policlinico “P. Giaccone” of Palermo (Italy), 100 of which were selected based on revised Bethesda guidelines, Amsterdam criteria II, or tissue MMR deficiency, and genetically tested for germline variants in LS- susceptibility genes. Results Our study showed that 32 out of 100 CRC patients harboured germline likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants in MMR genes. Conclusions The analysis of tissue microsatellite instability (MSI) status according to the revised Bethesda guidelines has been to be the best selection approach. However, using different selection approaches as complementary strategies is useful to identify LS carriers, reducing underdiagnosis of this syndrome. Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Germline mutations; Lynch Syndrome; Microsatellite instability; Mismatch Repair genes; MLH1; MMR-deficiency; MSH2; Dichirons2021

Key concepts: Lynch syndrome, Microsatellite instability, MLH1, MSH2, Germline, Germline mutation, DNA mismatch repair, Colorectal cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of different selection approaches for identifying Lynch Syndrome-related colorectalcancer patients: unity is strength — Research Paper | ScholarLens