2008•Encyclopedia of Life SciencesRequires access

Comparative Cytogenetics

Matthew Breen, Cordelia Langford

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

Abstract In the pre‐genomics era, the field of comparative cytogenetics was restricted to the comparison of banded chromosome preparations of the species being studied. The development of molecular biology and subsequent convergence of this field with conventional cytogenetics led to the development of molecular cytogenetics. The application of molecular cytogenetics, in particular multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization (MFISH), has revolutionized our ability to compare genomes at the chromosomal, subchromosomal and molecular levels, leading to much more defined knowledge about the processes of chromosomal rearrangement that have occurred during evolution. In this article we review very briefly some of the work that has led to a greater understanding of the comparative cytogenetics of mammals, in the context of their relationship to the human karyotype.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In the pre‐genomics era, the field of comparative cytogenetics was restricted to the comparison of banded chromosome preparations of the species being studied. The development of molecular biology and subsequent convergence of this field with conventional cytogenetics led to the development of molecular cytogenetics. The application of molecular cytogenetics, in particular multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization (MFISH), has revolutionized our ability to compare genomes at the chromosomal, subchromosomal and molecular levels, leading to much more defined knowledge about the processes of chromosomal rearrangement that have occurred during evolution. In this article we review very briefly some of the work that has led to a greater understanding of the comparative cytogenetics of mammals, in the context of their relationship to the human karyotype.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In the pre‐genomics era, the field of comparative cytogenetics was restricted to the comparison of banded chromosome preparations of the species being studied. The development of molecular biology and subsequent convergence of this field with conventional cytogenetics led to the development of molecular cytogenetics. The application of molecular cytogenetics, in particular multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization (MFISH), has revolutionized our ability to compare genomes at the chromosomal, subchromosomal and molecular levels, leading to much more defined knowledge about the processes of chromosomal rearrangement that have occurred during evolution. In this article we review very briefly some of the work that has led to a greater understanding of the comparative cytogenetics of mammals, in the context of their relationship to the human karyotype.

Key concepts: Molecular cytogenetics, Cytogenetics, Context (archaeology), Biology, Comparative genomic hybridization, Karyotype, Chromosome, Computational biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Cytogenetics — Research Paper | ScholarLens