2021PainRequires access

Cognitive biases among those with frequent or chronic headaches or migraines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Robert J. O’Hara, Louise Sharpe, Jemma Todd

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pattern of cognitive processing biases (ie, attentional, interpretation, and memory bias) towards headache and pain information observed in individuals with frequent or chronic headaches or migraines, compared with individuals without. We identified 11 studies (total N = 841). Most studies (10 of 11) assessed attentional bias. For reaction time-based attentional bias (k = 8), significant group differences were observed, with small (500 ms; g = 0.200) to medium (≥ 1000 ms; g = 0.544) effects. Those with chronic headaches showed an absolute attentional bias towards headache and pain information. In 2 eye-tracking studies, both found significant medium-to-large group differences on initial orientation. Interpretation and memory bias research was also reviewed. A medium-to-large effect was found for interpretation bias (k = 2; g = 0.708), whereas the effect for recall memory bias (k = 3) was not significant. Overall, the findings confirm an attentional bias for headache-related stimuli among people with headache, with some evidence for interpretation bias but equivocal evidence for a memory bias. For attentional biases, eye-tracking studies found evidence for biases in initial orienting. We provide suggestions for how to extend the current research to better understand cognitive biases in chronic headache.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pattern of cognitive processing biases (ie, attentional, interpretation, and memory bias) towards headache and pain information observed in individuals with frequent or chronic headaches or migraines, compared with individuals without. We identified 11 studies (total N = 841). Most studies (10 of 11) assessed attentional bias. For reaction time-based attentional bias (k = 8), significant group differences were observed, with small (500 ms; g = 0.200) to medium (≥ 1000 ms; g = 0.544) effects. Those with chronic headaches showed an absolute attentional bias towards headache and pain information. In 2 eye-tracking studies, both found significant medium-to-large group differences on initial orientation. Interpretation and memory bias research was also reviewed. A medium-to-large effect was found for interpretation bias (k = 2; g = 0.708), whereas the effect for recall memory bias (k = 3) was not significant. Overall, the findings confirm an attentional bias for headache-related stimuli among people with headache, with some evidence for interpretation bias but equivocal evidence for a memory bias. For attentional biases, eye-tracking studies found evidence for biases in initial orienting. We provide suggestions for how to extend the current research to better understand cognitive biases in chronic headache.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the pattern of cognitive processing biases (ie, attentional, interpretation, and memory bias) towards headache and pain information observed in individuals with frequent or chronic headaches or migraines, compared with individuals without. We identified 11 studies (total N = 841). Most studies (10 of 11) assessed attentional bias. For reaction time-based attentional bias (k = 8), significant group differences were observed, with small (500 ms; g = 0.200) to medium (≥ 1000 ms; g = 0.544) effects. Those with chronic headaches showed an absolute attentional bias towards headache and pain information. In 2 eye-tracking studies, both found significant medium-to-large group differences on initial orientation. Interpretation and memory bias research was also reviewed. A medium-to-large effect was found for interpretation bias (k = 2; g = 0.708), whereas the effect for recall memory bias (k = 3) was not significant. Overall, the findings confirm an attentional bias for headache-related stimuli among people with headache, with some evidence for interpretation bias but equivocal evidence for a memory bias. For attentional biases, eye-tracking studies found evidence for biases in initial orienting. We provide suggestions for how to extend the current research to better understand cognitive biases in chronic headache.

Key concepts: Attentional bias, Cognitive bias, Psychology, Meta-analysis, Cognition, Recall bias, Recall, Headaches

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cognitive biases among those with frequent or chronic headaches or migraines: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens