2021˜The œEuropean Proceedings of Social & Behavioural SciencesOpen access

Subjective Assessment Of Dialects In The Terminology Of German Dialectology

Inna Valerievna Senina, Galina Aleksandrovna Ageeva, Vera Vasilyevna Litvinenko

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The article discusses the problem of relations to a dialect as an extralinguistic factor, which not only contributed to the emergence of German dialectology as a linguistic discipline but also influenced the formation of terminology in the field of German dialectology. At the beginning of the article, a brief excursion is given about how dialectology has been revived as a science. Supporters of a populist point of view created lists of dialectisms that needed to be avoided in speech. Other scientists constituted dictionaries to preserve dialects as cultural heritage. One way or another, both approaches are a negative or positive attitude towards regional varieties of language - the cause of the creation of historical literary monuments, which served as the foundation for the formation of dialectology as science. Within the framework of social dialectology and perceptual dialectology, the study of such a phenomenon as a subjective assessment of the dialect took a separate niche, which is evidenced by the formation of many terminological nests reflecting a positive or negative assessment of the dialect. As an output, it is noted that the formation and development of the German dialectology and its terminological corps affected not only the attitude towards the dialect of its carriers but also the scientists of dialectologists. The article discusses the dependence of scientific knowledge on the influence of extralinguistic factors the relation to the dialect.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The article discusses the problem of relations to a dialect as an extralinguistic factor, which not only contributed to the emergence of German dialectology as a linguistic discipline but also influenced the formation of terminology in the field of German dialectology. At the beginning of the article, a brief excursion is given about how dialectology has been revived as a science. Supporters of a populist point of view created lists of dialectisms that needed to be avoided in speech. Other scientists constituted dictionaries to preserve dialects as cultural heritage. One way or another, both approaches are a negative or positive attitude towards regional varieties of language - the cause of the creation of historical literary monuments, which served as the foundation for the formation of dialectology as science. Within the framework of social dialectology and perceptual dialectology, the study of such a phenomenon as a subjective assessment of the dialect took a separate niche, which is evidenced by the formation of many terminological nests reflecting a positive or negative assessment of the dialect. As an output, it is noted that the formation and development of the German dialectology and its terminological corps affected not only the attitude towards the dialect of its carriers but also the scientists of dialectologists. The article discusses the dependence of scientific knowledge on the influence of extralinguistic factors the relation to the dialect.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The article discusses the problem of relations to a dialect as an extralinguistic factor, which not only contributed to the emergence of German dialectology as a linguistic discipline but also influenced the formation of terminology in the field of German dialectology. At the beginning of the article, a brief excursion is given about how dialectology has been revived as a science. Supporters of a populist point of view created lists of dialectisms that needed to be avoided in speech. Other scientists constituted dictionaries to preserve dialects as cultural heritage. One way or another, both approaches are a negative or positive attitude towards regional varieties of language - the cause of the creation of historical literary monuments, which served as the foundation for the formation of dialectology as science. Within the framework of social dialectology and perceptual dialectology, the study of such a phenomenon as a subjective assessment of the dialect took a separate niche, which is evidenced by the formation of many terminological nests reflecting a positive or negative assessment of the dialect. As an output, it is noted that the formation and development of the German dialectology and its terminological corps affected not only the attitude towards the dialect of its carriers but also the scientists of dialectologists. The article discusses the dependence of scientific knowledge on the influence of extralinguistic factors the relation to the dialect.

Key concepts: Dialectology, German, Terminology, Linguistics, Phenomenon, History, Germanic languages, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Subjective Assessment Of Dialects In The Terminology Of German Dialectology — Research Paper | ScholarLens