2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

Chapter Five. Daoist Equalization Against The Universal Principle: Zhang Taiyan’s Critique Of Late Qing Political Theory

Viren Murthy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter shows how Zhang formulated a critique of political institutions and ideologies from his unique Buddhist/Daoist perspective. He continues this negative gesture as he attacked the concept of tuniversal principle,t which in the late Qing could include the ideas of tevolution,t tnatural and scientific law,t and tethical norm.t These various, often interrelated, manifestations of the universal principle bring difference and particularity under a homogenizing principle. He deals with a topic that recurs in his writings, namely primordial confusion and its relation to the production of the world. He addressed four tconfusionst: tthe universal principle,t tevolution,t the idea that things are tonly matter,t and the idea of tnature.t These four are related in that they all arise from insufficient reflection on the role of consciousness in their production. The issues that Zhang's philosophy of equalization summons but never resolves are how to think politics outside of these dominant paradigms.Keywords: Buddhist; Daoist equalization; evolution; Qing; universal principle; Zhang Taiyan

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter shows how Zhang formulated a critique of political institutions and ideologies from his unique Buddhist/Daoist perspective. He continues this negative gesture as he attacked the concept of tuniversal principle,t which in the late Qing could include the ideas of tevolution,t tnatural and scientific law,t and tethical norm.t These various, often interrelated, manifestations of the universal principle bring difference and particularity under a homogenizing principle. He deals with a topic that recurs in his writings, namely primordial confusion and its relation to the production of the world. He addressed four tconfusionst: tthe universal principle,t tevolution,t the idea that things are tonly matter,t and the idea of tnature.t These four are related in that they all arise from insufficient reflection on the role of consciousness in their production. The issues that Zhang's philosophy of equalization summons but never resolves are how to think politics outside of these dominant paradigms.Keywords: Buddhist; Daoist equalization; evolution; Qing; universal principle; Zhang Taiyan

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter shows how Zhang formulated a critique of political institutions and ideologies from his unique Buddhist/Daoist perspective. He continues this negative gesture as he attacked the concept of tuniversal principle,t which in the late Qing could include the ideas of tevolution,t tnatural and scientific law,t and tethical norm.t These various, often interrelated, manifestations of the universal principle bring difference and particularity under a homogenizing principle. He deals with a topic that recurs in his writings, namely primordial confusion and its relation to the production of the world. He addressed four tconfusionst: tthe universal principle,t tevolution,t the idea that things are tonly matter,t and the idea of tnature.t These four are related in that they all arise from insufficient reflection on the role of consciousness in their production. The issues that Zhang's philosophy of equalization summons but never resolves are how to think politics outside of these dominant paradigms.Keywords: Buddhist; Daoist equalization; evolution; Qing; universal principle; Zhang Taiyan

Key concepts: Zhàng, Buddhism, Ideology, Philosophy, Epistemology, Norm (philosophy), Politics, Consciousness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chapter Five. Daoist Equalization Against The Universal Principle: Zhang Taiyan’s Critique Of Late Qing Political Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens