2002Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Smoothness Provision for Bridge Decks

Kevin K. McGhee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A contemporary survey of bridge ride quality is described, and use of the survey to support the development of a modern smoothness provision for bridge decks is discussed. The survey found that bridges have an average of 60% more roughness than most mainline highway pavements [as measured by use of the international roughness index (IRI)]. However, a secondary analysis revealed that beam and girder camber can easily contribute more than 1000 mm/km of additional IRI roughness, which suggests that IRI may not be an equitable tool for measurement of the construction quality of bridges. This finding led to an additional analysis that focused on the use of a simulated rolling straightedge as a tool to control smoothness. Ultimately, the study demonstrated how inertial (and high-speed) profiling equipment can be applied to control bridge deck roughness through the use of a simulation that mimics the traditional 3-m straightedge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A contemporary survey of bridge ride quality is described, and use of the survey to support the development of a modern smoothness provision for bridge decks is discussed. The survey found that bridges have an average of 60% more roughness than most mainline highway pavements [as measured by use of the international roughness index (IRI)]. However, a secondary analysis revealed that beam and girder camber can easily contribute more than 1000 mm/km of additional IRI roughness, which suggests that IRI may not be an equitable tool for measurement of the construction quality of bridges. This finding led to an additional analysis that focused on the use of a simulated rolling straightedge as a tool to control smoothness. Ultimately, the study demonstrated how inertial (and high-speed) profiling equipment can be applied to control bridge deck roughness through the use of a simulation that mimics the traditional 3-m straightedge.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A contemporary survey of bridge ride quality is described, and use of the survey to support the development of a modern smoothness provision for bridge decks is discussed. The survey found that bridges have an average of 60% more roughness than most mainline highway pavements [as measured by use of the international roughness index (IRI)]. However, a secondary analysis revealed that beam and girder camber can easily contribute more than 1000 mm/km of additional IRI roughness, which suggests that IRI may not be an equitable tool for measurement of the construction quality of bridges. This finding led to an additional analysis that focused on the use of a simulated rolling straightedge as a tool to control smoothness. Ultimately, the study demonstrated how inertial (and high-speed) profiling equipment can be applied to control bridge deck roughness through the use of a simulation that mimics the traditional 3-m straightedge.

Key concepts: Smoothness, Bridge deck, Bridge (graph theory), Camber (aerodynamics), Ride quality, Surface finish, Engineering, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Smoothness Provision for Bridge Decks — Research Paper | ScholarLens