Evaluation of Orthometric and Related Height Systems Using a Simulated Mountain Gravity Field
Michael L. Dennis, W. E. Featherstone
Abstract
Michael L. Dennis, W. E. Featherstone
Abstract
Abstract. With the widespread computation of gravimetric geoid and quasi-geoid models for GPS height transformation, there is renewed interest in defining vertical datums using height systems that are fully compatible with GPS-derived heights. Although orthometric heights are commonly used for such purposes, computation of their true value from spirit leveling observations requires an exact knowledge of gravity along the (curved) plumbline above the geoid. Without direct gravity observa-tions, several hypotheses must be made, and as such, numerous variants (approximations) of the true orthometric height have been derived. This paper evaluates six height systems using a simulated (exact) gravity field from a well-defined prismoidal mountain mass for which the gravity field and plumblines are unambiguously defined. From this, the simulated (true) orthometric heights are computed and compared to various approximate orthometric heights. Geometric (ellipsoidal), nor-mal, and dynamic heights are also evaluated. Com-parisons of the height systems are made regarding their utility, accuracy, and compatibility with grav-imetric geoid and quasi-geoid models.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract. With the widespread computation of gravimetric geoid and quasi-geoid models for GPS height transformation, there is renewed interest in defining vertical datums using height systems that are fully compatible with GPS-derived heights. Although orthometric heights are commonly used for such purposes, computation of their true value from spirit leveling observations requires an exact knowledge of gravity along the (curved) plumbline above the geoid. Without direct gravity observa-tions, several hypotheses must be made, and as such, numerous variants (approximations) of the true orthometric height have been derived. This paper evaluates six height systems using a simulated (exact) gravity field from a well-defined prismoidal mountain mass for which the gravity field and plumblines are unambiguously defined. From this, the simulated (true) orthometric heights are computed and compared to various approximate orthometric heights. Geometric (ellipsoidal), nor-mal, and dynamic heights are also evaluated. Com-parisons of the height systems are made regarding their utility, accuracy, and compatibility with grav-imetric geoid and quasi-geoid models.
Key concepts: Geoid, Undulation of the geoid, Geodesy, Geodetic datum, Gravitational field, Dynamic height, Computation, Vertical deflection