2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of Orthometric and Related Height Systems Using a Simulated Mountain Gravity Field

Michael L. Dennis, W. E. Featherstone

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract. With the widespread computation of gravimetric geoid and quasi-geoid models for GPS height transformation, there is renewed interest in defining vertical datums using height systems that are fully compatible with GPS-derived heights. Although orthometric heights are commonly used for such purposes, computation of their true value from spirit leveling observations requires an exact knowledge of gravity along the (curved) plumbline above the geoid. Without direct gravity observa-tions, several hypotheses must be made, and as such, numerous variants (approximations) of the true orthometric height have been derived. This paper evaluates six height systems using a simulated (exact) gravity field from a well-defined prismoidal mountain mass for which the gravity field and plumblines are unambiguously defined. From this, the simulated (true) orthometric heights are computed and compared to various approximate orthometric heights. Geometric (ellipsoidal), nor-mal, and dynamic heights are also evaluated. Com-parisons of the height systems are made regarding their utility, accuracy, and compatibility with grav-imetric geoid and quasi-geoid models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract. With the widespread computation of gravimetric geoid and quasi-geoid models for GPS height transformation, there is renewed interest in defining vertical datums using height systems that are fully compatible with GPS-derived heights. Although orthometric heights are commonly used for such purposes, computation of their true value from spirit leveling observations requires an exact knowledge of gravity along the (curved) plumbline above the geoid. Without direct gravity observa-tions, several hypotheses must be made, and as such, numerous variants (approximations) of the true orthometric height have been derived. This paper evaluates six height systems using a simulated (exact) gravity field from a well-defined prismoidal mountain mass for which the gravity field and plumblines are unambiguously defined. From this, the simulated (true) orthometric heights are computed and compared to various approximate orthometric heights. Geometric (ellipsoidal), nor-mal, and dynamic heights are also evaluated. Com-parisons of the height systems are made regarding their utility, accuracy, and compatibility with grav-imetric geoid and quasi-geoid models.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract. With the widespread computation of gravimetric geoid and quasi-geoid models for GPS height transformation, there is renewed interest in defining vertical datums using height systems that are fully compatible with GPS-derived heights. Although orthometric heights are commonly used for such purposes, computation of their true value from spirit leveling observations requires an exact knowledge of gravity along the (curved) plumbline above the geoid. Without direct gravity observa-tions, several hypotheses must be made, and as such, numerous variants (approximations) of the true orthometric height have been derived. This paper evaluates six height systems using a simulated (exact) gravity field from a well-defined prismoidal mountain mass for which the gravity field and plumblines are unambiguously defined. From this, the simulated (true) orthometric heights are computed and compared to various approximate orthometric heights. Geometric (ellipsoidal), nor-mal, and dynamic heights are also evaluated. Com-parisons of the height systems are made regarding their utility, accuracy, and compatibility with grav-imetric geoid and quasi-geoid models.

Key concepts: Geoid, Undulation of the geoid, Geodesy, Geodetic datum, Gravitational field, Dynamic height, Computation, Vertical deflection

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Orthometric and Related Height Systems Using a Simulated Mountain Gravity Field — Research Paper | ScholarLens