2008PubMedRequires access

Comparison of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein serum assay results obtained using Dade-Behring BNII nephelometer and Ortho Vitros FS 5.1 clinical analyzer in respect of CRP-related risk assessment of chronic metabolic diseases.

Beata Kuśnierz‐Cabala, Wojciech Gernand, Anna Ząbek-Adamska, Aleksandra Tokarz, J Naskalski

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum concentration of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) can predict the risk of chronic metabolic and cardiovascular diseases but it is unclear whether turbidimetric high sensitive assays of CRP are adequate. METHODS: Concentrations of serum CRP in 126 samples of serum were measured with high-sensitivity methods using nephelometry (BN II Nephelometer) and turbidimetry (Ortho Vitros FS 5.1). RESULTS: For CRP concentrations measured by nephelometry and turbidimetry intra-assay CVs were 3.2 and 0.9% at mean CRP concentrations of 1.4 and 2.1 mg/l, inter-assay CVs for commercial controls were 3.1% and 3.6% at mean concentrations of 1.3 and 1.7 mg/l, and mean biases were 7.62% and 2.26%, respectively. Measurements were strongly, linearly correlated (r = 0.99; CRP vitros = 0.03 +1.03 CRP (BN II)). When disease risk was assessed by nephelometry and turbidimetry, results were similar. If the risk of disease was classified as moderate (1.0 < CRP < or = 3.0 mg/l) or high (CRP > 3.0 mg/l), the frequency of misclassified cases was only 2.3 and 2.1%, respectively. The classification agreement weighted kappa coefficient was 0.94 (95% C.I.: 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: turbidimetric high sensitive CRP assays can properly classify CRP-related prediction of chronic metabolic diseases with special consideration on cardiovascular risk.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Serum concentration of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) can predict the risk of chronic metabolic and cardiovascular diseases but it is unclear whether turbidimetric high sensitive assays of CRP are adequate. METHODS: Concentrations of serum CRP in 126 samples of serum were measured with high-sensitivity methods using nephelometry (BN II Nephelometer) and turbidimetry (Ortho Vitros FS 5.1). RESULTS: For CRP concentrations measured by nephelometry and turbidimetry intra-assay CVs were 3.2 and 0.9% at mean CRP concentrations of 1.4 and 2.1 mg/l, inter-assay CVs for commercial controls were 3.1% and 3.6% at mean concentrations of 1.3 and 1.7 mg/l, and mean biases were 7.62% and 2.26%, respectively. Measurements were strongly, linearly correlated (r = 0.99; CRP vitros = 0.03 +1.03 CRP (BN II)). When disease risk was assessed by nephelometry and turbidimetry, results were similar. If the risk of disease was classified as moderate (1.0 < CRP < or = 3.0 mg/l) or high (CRP > 3.0 mg/l), the frequency of misclassified cases was only 2.3 and 2.1%, respectively. The classification agreement weighted kappa coefficient was 0.94 (95% C.I.: 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: turbidimetric high sensitive CRP assays can properly classify CRP-related prediction of chronic metabolic diseases with special consideration on cardiovascular risk.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Serum concentration of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) can predict the risk of chronic metabolic and cardiovascular diseases but it is unclear whether turbidimetric high sensitive assays of CRP are adequate. METHODS: Concentrations of serum CRP in 126 samples of serum were measured with high-sensitivity methods using nephelometry (BN II Nephelometer) and turbidimetry (Ortho Vitros FS 5.1). RESULTS: For CRP concentrations measured by nephelometry and turbidimetry intra-assay CVs were 3.2 and 0.9% at mean CRP concentrations of 1.4 and 2.1 mg/l, inter-assay CVs for commercial controls were 3.1% and 3.6% at mean concentrations of 1.3 and 1.7 mg/l, and mean biases were 7.62% and 2.26%, respectively. Measurements were strongly, linearly correlated (r = 0.99; CRP vitros = 0.03 +1.03 CRP (BN II)). When disease risk was assessed by nephelometry and turbidimetry, results were similar. If the risk of disease was classified as moderate (1.0 < CRP < or = 3.0 mg/l) or high (CRP > 3.0 mg/l), the frequency of misclassified cases was only 2.3 and 2.1%, respectively. The classification agreement weighted kappa coefficient was 0.94 (95% C.I.: 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: turbidimetric high sensitive CRP assays can properly classify CRP-related prediction of chronic metabolic diseases with special consideration on cardiovascular risk.

Key concepts: Nephelometry, Turbidimetry, Nephelometer, Medicine, C-reactive protein, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein serum assay results obtained using Dade-Behring BNII nephelometer and Ortho Vitros FS 5.1 clinical analyzer in respect of CRP-related risk assessment of chronic metabolic diseases. — Research Paper | ScholarLens