Performance of chickpea variety CNG - 663 in front line demonstration under irrigated conditions
Dharmanand Verma, Swati Mehta
Abstract
Dharmanand Verma, Swati Mehta
Abstract
Total 130 Front line demonstrations on Chickpea variety GNG-663 were conducted at farmers' fields in district Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) during rabi 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2009-10. On an average, 17.5% higher grain yield was recorded under demonstrations than the farmer's traditional practices. The extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 197.8 kg/ha, 876 kg/ha and 38.9%, respectively. An additional investments of Rs.1499/ha coupled with scientific monitoring of demonstrations and non-monetary factors resulted in additional return of Rs. 3141/ha. Fluctuating minimum support price of chickpea during different years influenced the economic returns per unit area. On four years average basis incremental benefit: cost ratio was found as 2.1.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Total 130 Front line demonstrations on Chickpea variety GNG-663 were conducted at farmers' fields in district Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) during rabi 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2009-10. On an average, 17.5% higher grain yield was recorded under demonstrations than the farmer's traditional practices. The extension gap, technology gap and technology index were 197.8 kg/ha, 876 kg/ha and 38.9%, respectively. An additional investments of Rs.1499/ha coupled with scientific monitoring of demonstrations and non-monetary factors resulted in additional return of Rs. 3141/ha. Fluctuating minimum support price of chickpea during different years influenced the economic returns per unit area. On four years average basis incremental benefit: cost ratio was found as 2.1.
Key concepts: Agricultural economics, Yield (engineering), Mathematics, Front line, Toxicology, Agricultural science, Agriculture, Unit (ring theory)