1994Scholarship @ Cornell Law (Cornell University)Open access

GATTzilla v. Communities

Michael H. Shuman

Open full text 28 citations

Abstract

The word "community" is used here to mean the jurisdiction of political and legal power most accessible to citizens.Usually, this is synonymous with a city, town, or village.A neighborhood within a municipality, such as Russian Hill in San Francisco, might also be considered a community if the city has given it meaningful power. 27

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The word "community" is used here to mean the jurisdiction of political and legal power most accessible to citizens.Usually, this is synonymous with a city, town, or village.A neighborhood within a municipality, such as Russian Hill in San Francisco, might also be considered a community if the city has given it meaningful power. 27

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The word "community" is used here to mean the jurisdiction of political and legal power most accessible to citizens.Usually, this is synonymous with a city, town, or village.A neighborhood within a municipality, such as Russian Hill in San Francisco, might also be considered a community if the city has given it meaningful power. 27

Key concepts: Political science, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GATTzilla v. Communities — Research Paper | ScholarLens