A common law for southern Africa: Roman law or indigenous African law?
Gardiol J. Van Niekerk
Abstract
Gardiol J. Van Niekerk
Abstract
There is no doubt that Roman law gave Africa a scientific legal framework and structure which can fulfil the needs of a changing Africa. Even though judicial precedent has eroded the direct relevance of this law, its underlying values still provide an important substratum around which the common law of the Southern African countries revolve. These values and the African values founded in the spirit of ubuntu, are in many respects different, but they are not irreconcilable. The fact that there are differences in these systems of law does not mean that Roman law should be the exclusive source of the Southern African ius commune or that ubuntu should be denied for the sake of Roman law. Western jurisprudence may have a lot to learn from African thought. Both Roman law and indigenous African law have much to contribute to a common law for Southern Africa. Just as the European ius commune drew on Roman law, canon law and the customary Germanic laws of the time, so should our African ius commune be based on both Roman law and African law.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There is no doubt that Roman law gave Africa a scientific legal framework and structure which can fulfil the needs of a changing Africa. Even though judicial precedent has eroded the direct relevance of this law, its underlying values still provide an important substratum around which the common law of the Southern African countries revolve. These values and the African values founded in the spirit of ubuntu, are in many respects different, but they are not irreconcilable. The fact that there are differences in these systems of law does not mean that Roman law should be the exclusive source of the Southern African ius commune or that ubuntu should be denied for the sake of Roman law. Western jurisprudence may have a lot to learn from African thought. Both Roman law and indigenous African law have much to contribute to a common law for Southern Africa. Just as the European ius commune drew on Roman law, canon law and the customary Germanic laws of the time, so should our African ius commune be based on both Roman law and African law.
Key concepts: Law, Common law, Jurisprudence, Civil law (Civil law), Comparative law, Indigenous, Sources of law, Canon law