2013Seton Hall University eRepository (Seton Hall University)Requires access

Picture This: Campaign Finance Law and the Question of Values

Laurence D. Laufer

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A campaign is not an election. No matter how well-financed its advertising, a campaign’s success depends entirely on whether voters “buy” what is being “sold” on Election Day. Campaign finance law sets standards for how candidates and others finance their efforts to persuade (or dissuade) voters in an election. The effort to limit the role of money in federal elections is reflected in laws that date back over a century. In the 2012 federal elections, the state of campaign finance law reflected the failure of legislation to achieve a comprehensive set of limitations. The laws on the books have been superseded by judicially imposed barriers to limitations. As a result, complex regulations enforce arguably vestigial limits. This campaign finance regime is overseen by a partisan mindset in Congress and at the Federal Election Commission, which also serves to block legislative or regulatory innovation. The judicial decision most vilified and celebrated in this area is,

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A campaign is not an election. No matter how well-financed its advertising, a campaign’s success depends entirely on whether voters “buy” what is being “sold” on Election Day. Campaign finance law sets standards for how candidates and others finance their efforts to persuade (or dissuade) voters in an election. The effort to limit the role of money in federal elections is reflected in laws that date back over a century. In the 2012 federal elections, the state of campaign finance law reflected the failure of legislation to achieve a comprehensive set of limitations. The laws on the books have been superseded by judicially imposed barriers to limitations. As a result, complex regulations enforce arguably vestigial limits. This campaign finance regime is overseen by a partisan mindset in Congress and at the Federal Election Commission, which also serves to block legislative or regulatory innovation. The judicial decision most vilified and celebrated in this area is,

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A campaign is not an election. No matter how well-financed its advertising, a campaign’s success depends entirely on whether voters “buy” what is being “sold” on Election Day. Campaign finance law sets standards for how candidates and others finance their efforts to persuade (or dissuade) voters in an election. The effort to limit the role of money in federal elections is reflected in laws that date back over a century. In the 2012 federal elections, the state of campaign finance law reflected the failure of legislation to achieve a comprehensive set of limitations. The laws on the books have been superseded by judicially imposed barriers to limitations. As a result, complex regulations enforce arguably vestigial limits. This campaign finance regime is overseen by a partisan mindset in Congress and at the Federal Election Commission, which also serves to block legislative or regulatory innovation. The judicial decision most vilified and celebrated in this area is,

Key concepts: Campaign finance, Federal election, Election law, Commission, Legislature, Political science, Mindset, Legislation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Picture This: Campaign Finance Law and the Question of Values — Research Paper | ScholarLens