Tools and Outcomes: Computer music systems and musical directions
Andrew R. Brown
Abstract
Open-access reader
Andrew R. Brown
Abstract
Open-access reader
In the changing context of computer music composition where the computer becomes a commodity rather than a novelty, this paper examines the composers' relationship with the computer and how that relates to music making. Computer music making has a history of close association between tool making and music making. This relationship was first forged out of necessity, then out of interest and a dedication to new ways of composing and performing. At the turn of the century, after 50 years of computer music, computers are becoming just another musical instrument. With the development of a wide range of computer music software and hardware, tool making is no longer a necessity for computer music making, nor perhaps even a badge of honour. In this paper I seek to present a broader understanding of computer music systems and musical directions by expanding the context in which computer music tools are examined to include the ever-changing social and personal situation of their users. From this perspective it is proposed that while the music is indeed influenced by the computing tools, it is in a way less direct and more complex than previously assumed. The causal effect for composers of tools on outcomes is neither direct nor consistent, I argue, and is less significant than cultural context of and personal engagement with the tools.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the changing context of computer music composition where the computer becomes a commodity rather than a novelty, this paper examines the composers' relationship with the computer and how that relates to music making. Computer music making has a history of close association between tool making and music making. This relationship was first forged out of necessity, then out of interest and a dedication to new ways of composing and performing. At the turn of the century, after 50 years of computer music, computers are becoming just another musical instrument. With the development of a wide range of computer music software and hardware, tool making is no longer a necessity for computer music making, nor perhaps even a badge of honour. In this paper I seek to present a broader understanding of computer music systems and musical directions by expanding the context in which computer music tools are examined to include the ever-changing social and personal situation of their users. From this perspective it is proposed that while the music is indeed influenced by the computing tools, it is in a way less direct and more complex than previously assumed. The causal effect for composers of tools on outcomes is neither direct nor consistent, I argue, and is less significant than cultural context of and personal engagement with the tools.
Key concepts: Computer music, Music and artificial intelligence, Honour, Pop music automation, Context (archaeology), Musical composition, Programming, Computer science